Basis Test News Today

Seats pelosi, schumer, and biden, thats the trifecta from hell for big government. First Lady Melania Trump receiving the official 2020 White House Christmas tree. Its more than 18 feet tall it. Comes from a family farm in oregon. That tree will be showcased in the blue room of the white house. We built this city on Rock And Roll we built this city brian so glad i put my quarter in the jukebox. I never tire of it. Thats the story of New York City. Welcome to the big show. We do have good news fo...

This Littler Lightbulb highlights some of the more significant employment and labor law developments at the U.S. Supreme Court and federal courts of appeal over the last month.

This president. and you know, inlg t think the dissenters thought, how can you possibly ignore all of this language? this is clearly a pretext for an anti-muslim animus. and the president said so himself. but justice roberts said, we set that all aside, because he wanted to use what is known as a rational basis test. and if you can find any rational basis to support the decision, then you should. and he said that if you look just at what theyre doing, it affects really only 8% of the worlds musl...

Scrutiny test, but even if it doesnt and it could apply some sort of intermediate level of scrutiny or a rational basis test, which means the state can support this law, which affects a group of people if it has a logical basis for doing so but what we showed in the proposition 8 case was, there is no evidence supporting any argument that is logical as to why these individual citizens should not be able to marry, should not be able to travel with their family from one state to another and have t...

First marriage is a fund aament right. we needed to do that and the defendants even agreed with that. the supreme court has ruled that 14 times in the last 100 years. second, we needed to prove that depriving gay and lesbian citizens of the right to marry seriously harmed them and seriously harmed the children that they were raising. and we proved that, too, not only through our witnesses but through the defense witnesses. >> can i interrupt on that point? i think its significant. in effect, are...

Right. we needed to do that and the defendants even agreed with that. the supreme court has ruled that 14 times in the last 100 years. second, we needed to prove that depriving gay and lesbian citizens of the right to marry seriously harmed them and seriously harmed the children that they were raising. and we proved that, too, not only through our witnesses but through the defense witnesses. >> can i interrupt on that point? i think its significant. in effect, are you vaing you want gays and les...

>> medicare advantage. >> greta: medicare im sorry. if she lived in the state of florida she would get that coast deal they got for seniors in -- that cozy deal they for seniors in florida. >> the infamous gatorade provision denial of my -- how can it be anything about an arbitrary and capricious decision to say if you live in a few certain favored zip codes in the state of florida you keep a good program like medicare advantage. citizens in the other 49 states and every missouri senior is out o...

>> medicare advantage. >> greta: medicare im sorry. if she lived in the state of florida she would get that coast deal they got for seniors in -- that cozy deal they for seniors in florida. >> the infamous gatorade provision denial of my -- how can it be anything about an arbitrary and capricious decision to say if you live in a few certain favored zip codes in the state of florida you keep a good program like medicare advantage. citizens in the other 49 states and every missouri senior is out o...

Because colorado couldnt meet even rational basis test. forget about whether its strict scrutiny or something close to strict scrutiny. it couldnt meet rational basis test because colorado couldnt articulate any good reason, maybe there is one out there, i dont know, but i said they have articulated nothing. >> lets continue on now with some other cases because it is a bit of a pattern. not a concurring opinion, but in the hobby lobby case you found the corporations were legal persons and could ...