Page 139 - Binding News Today

State and local prosecutors. can you think of any precedent for this? >> no, theres no precedent. this is uncharted territory. the one caution, ali, is the olc opinion is binding on the executive branch which includes the special counsel. its not binding on state attorneys general. but the underlying analysis in the olc opinion concludes that indictment of a sitting president is unconstitutional. if that analysis is correct, in other words if courts were to agree with that analysis, that would p...

A spray can for much black paint. binding why oh. why cut his. clients. a box cutter. and take. lets go first cut off several pieces from the binding wire. and dismantle sheet. to measure the circumference of the line wind the wire around it dont forget to leave room for the overlaps. now tied you notice together with binding wire. using to cut away the top and bottom rows of the nut is.

Next to the outline shape with the craft now if you should end up with too much or rings left supplements you need to. make sure to remove field glue from the metal rings orange oil will help you there . now connect the rings to the wire mesh. use a pair of pliers to bend the ends of wire around the rings. once its fixed repeat the process for the side to start by cutting the first open then remove the green binding. and finally. fix the body in place. now all thats left is to color you can spra...

Perjury trap. that means the president could go straight to the supreme court. the other is whether there could be an indictment of a sitting president. the only thing that will be legally binding is what the supreme court decides. to have a sitting president facing these types of legal challenges that have not been decide by the supreme court, deciding who gets to sit on that court and potentially make those decisions seems the me to be in and of itself requires slowing this process down and se...

Conversation with mueller is a perjury trap. that means the president could go straight to the supreme court. the other is whether there could be an indictment of a sitting president. the only thing that will be legally binding is what the supreme court decides. to have a sitting president facing these types of legal challenges that have not been decide by the supreme court, deciding who gets to sit on that court and potentially make those decisions seems the me to be in and of itself requires s...

Breaking her confidentiality deal. the trump campaign is saying that when she went ahead and campaigned with the trump campaign, that she signed a confidentiality agreement and so coming out and calling the president a racist and dishing other west wing dirt essentially breaks that confidentiality agreement. so after hearing evidence an arbitrator will either dismiss the charge or slap her with fine. the question, is it clear the agreement was binding and do they have the case, the trump campaig...

Going on in england but this is clearly consuming him. he has now been for the better part of the last two days completely consumed personally pushing back against omarosas claims in her book. >> jeffrey toobin, well transition out of this in a second but we were talking to josh dawson about these non-disclosure agreements. clearly omarosa isnt respecting any non-disclosure agreements. she said she had one with him when she was an "apprentice" performer, didnt sign one after the white house, tha...

Action since omarosa did start on this publicity tour for this book where she makes these stunning allegations. this is from the trump campaign. theyre filing an arbitration action against omarosa saying that she violated a 2016 nondisclosure agreement that she signed with the campaign. now, we have not seen the agreement that omarosa herself signed specifically with her signature on it, but we have seen one of the campaign passed out to other staffers. in that nda, it does say that those signin...

Out some kind of paperwork at multiple points during her employment which this would have been a violation of. >> julie: speaking of paperwork. she signed a non-disclosure. she adamantly supported the president. first of all she thought she was supporting a future president who was a racist she wouldnt have done so and signed a non-disclosure agreement. thats legally binding. this woman is in hot water. i dont believe this is over yet. >> but also she started to make accusations about me yesterd...

Do you think it is provocative or potentially what does it mean? >> thing is the iranians showing there still people to be reckoned with. although there hasnt been a lunch for about a year, actually in 2016 and 2017, the iranians had a pattern of launches but i think it is all part of showing they still remain and influence in the part of the world. eric: someone say its a violation of 2231 which calls on a man not to directly related to ballistic missile to be capable of delivering nuclear weap...