Page 156 - Binding News Today

It was the most conventional traditional thing the campaign did in the entirety of the campaign. thats what candidates normally do, is they say heres the list of things were going to do. it was very untrumpian during the cape. now thats coming back to bite him a little bit. having said that, you know, not to give him a pass at all, but we all -- those of us who have covered many of these contracts during campaigns also know that this is a campaign document and it is aspirational though maybe not...

They have already said in the deal itself, we re-affirm, we will never -- all were doing is holding them to their words. all were doing is we say we accept that part of the deal as binding as every other part of the deal. the other material about rockets, we made a mistake. it wasnt in the deal. we are stuck with that. congress will have to enact the statute saying the part of the deal that says we will never ever seek to develop nuclear weapons, thats binding on you. if you try to break that --...

That. why would we want to emphasis the line again? >> because they claim its only in the pro log to the deal. theres some vague international law that says the only binding parts of the deal are the parts that are in the body, not the pro log. what were entitled to interpret the deal in the context of what they agreed to in the pro log. we dont have to change a single word. >> what is the risk to us if we back away from this deal and -- >> wont back a -- >> neil: hear me out. the world is alrea...

When he said this to bret last night. >> i still in fact we should say that was a deal made by a previous administration. it is not legally binding, never submitted to the congress for approval. it is not a treaty. a political agreement with the previous administration. there is a new administration. >> bill: what to do now. bob corker travels all the time overseas. he said secretary tillerson made clear take regardless of irans technical compliance the with deal were not under any illusion from...

Paid for that. the company may pay more. we look at the legal side of this. these internal investigations are unpredictable. it was the same law firm in the roger ailes context that did the investigation that led to his ouster. paul weiss, that only lasted ten days before removal. they interviewed over 24 women from fox news, including allegations from "high profile personalities" according to accounts of it. so these investigations are not legally binding, they dont create a legal or criminal r...

Position, but thats consistent with his views when he was oklahoma attorney general. given what weve seen with the rise and fall of steve bannon, when youre going into these conversations, is it smart to get out publicly on an issue where you might be at odds with the presidents daughter? >> no. this is one of the times were reading about palace intrigue about whos up and whos down. this is one of those tests about really does who carries weight and on the jared kushner and ivanka trump side car...

Phrase that republicans used in 2013, this went after one airfield, president obama was talked about going after typhoon a five airfields, there was no real degradation of the chemical stockpile.oon five airfields, there was no real degradation of the chemical stockpile. in all likelihood, trump gave a heads up to syria that he was going to take this strike because he informed republicans according to reports that there was going to be this strike. the russians rather. and the russians likely in...

A freedom of information act request with not the white house but the military. there was an asker but also an askee. now shes been able to publish the evidence showing that in fact, the trump folks, the trump inauguration committee really was, quote, seriously considering adding military vehicles to the inaugural parade. the conversation started as, can you send us some pictures of military vehicles we could add to the parade. defense department official says to his or her colleague, i explaine...

And configuration, paint scheme, uniform for crew members, et cetera before we start providing pictures which might be regarded as binding. so this e-mail from one pentagon official to another, which has now been released by the freedom of information act request shows the pentagon freaking out because the trump folks really did ask them to do this thing. they wanted options of what it looks like. we now have this direct evidence because the trump people really did want to rent freaking missile ...

But the military. there was an asker but also an askee. now shes been able to publish the evidence showing that in fact, the trump folks, the trump inauguration committee really was, quote, seriously considering adding military vehicles to the inaugural parade. the conversation started as, can you send us some pictures of military vehicles we could add to the parade. defense department official says to his or her colleague, i explained that such support would be out of guidelines. im reluctant t...