Was past president of this and i helped Ted Bundy go to prison, i was done. That was it. Three decades later the Innocence Project took his case and newly analyzed dna showed someone else committed the crime. Did you ever think you were going to get out . No. I was going to die in prison. Four separate governmental scientific bodies have concluded that scientific Bite Mark comparisons arent valid. The national institute for standards and technology, the Gold Standard for Measurement Science said in 2022 that Bite Mark analysis lacks a sufficient scientific foundation because Human Dental Patterns have not been shown to be unique at the individual level. One 2016 study found that selfdescribed experts couldnt distinguish between animal Bite Marks and human marks. People that were board certified did not agree about what a Bite Mark was. If its science and its science and its not reproduceable and not reliable, courts
Of law should not allow it in. Period. Bite Mark Analysis has been used in thousands of cases and no u. S. Court has ruled it inadmissible. There are still many people still in jails because of bite mark testimony. Charles mccrory has been incarcerated for 38 years, convicted of murdering his wife based on bite mark evidence. He spoke to us from a prison facility. Mr. Mccrory, did you kill your wife . I did not kill my wife. After the original Dental Expert recanted his testimony, prosecutors offered him a deal. Admit to killing his wife and go free. You refused to take it, why . I refused to take it because i didnt kill her. The Innocence Project is still fighting to clear his name. My faith is strong, and i believe god is in control. Charles mccrory has appeals pending in federal court. The Innocence Project says 30 people convicted of Bite Marks have been exonerated. Kate
of law should not allow it in. period. bite mark analysis has been used in thousands of cases and no u.s. court has ruled it inadmissible. there are still many people still in jails because of bite mark testimony. charles mccrory has been incarcerated for 38 years, convicted of murdering his wife based on bite mark evidence. he spoke to us from a prison facility. mr. mccrory, did you kill your wife? i did not kill my wife. after the original dental expert recanted his testimony, prosecutors offered him a deal. admit to killing his wife and go free. you refused to take it, why? i refused to take it because i didn t kill her. the innocence project is still fighting to clear his name. my faith is strong, and i believe god is in control. charles mccrory has appeals pending in federal court. the innocence project says 30 people convicted of bite marks have been exonerated. kate?
was past president of this and i helped ted bundy go to prison, i was done. that was it. three decades later the innocence project took his case and newly analyzed dna showed someone else committed the crime. did you ever think you were going to get out? no. i was going to die in prison. four separate governmental scientific bodies have concluded that scientific bite mark comparisons aren t valid. the national institute for standards and technology, the gold standard for measurement science said in 2022 that bite mark analysis lacks a sufficient scientific foundation because human dental patterns have not been shown to be unique at the individual level. one 2016 study found that self-described experts couldn t distinguish between animal bite marks and human marks. people that were board certified did not agree about what a bite mark was. if it s science and it s science and it s not reproduceable and not reliable, courts
Sacramento, CA (PRWEB) July 05, 2023 Ongoing concerns about the use of bite mark analysis as evidence in criminal trials has sparked controversy in both