Border Wall System Contracts News Today

Canceled the border wall system contracts. canceled effectively $16 billion of wall contract stopping noxious wall construction but installation of supporting technology. >> a lot of this will be in litigation probably for years but it is going to cost more to cancel the contract then it would have just complete the wall. >> former border -- because that taxpayer ways but in canceling the contracts come in the government also relinquished any contactor guarantees when they were forced off the jo...

There because president biden canceled those border wall system contracts. >> we have to pay for any of the materials that were already purchased. a lot of this will be in litigation probably for years but it will cost more to cancel the contracts than it would have to complete the wall. >> former chief rodney scott says it didnt make sense to cancel those. now the federal government assumes ally built and gives up any guarantees that contractors fix their work. example, flooding and reroute tha...

Miles of electrical cable so the gates work so theres power here. all baking in the sun and exposed to the elements. you paid for it, but it sits there because president biden canceled those border wall system contracts. other stockpiles exist in texas where at the present stopped a majority of those wall contracts. former chief, randy scott, because the decision shortsighted. >> border patrol has been working on a strategy for over 30 years in the border wall system was part of it. it was not p...

Fencing that remain unfinished. >> you are talking probably at least 100 miles or more before you will see other cameras. >> where did all the equipment go? we found one stockpile near huma. >> a mile down the road is something the government doesnt want you to see. miles of fiberoptic cable for detection system. lights, cameras, sensors, polls, miles of electrical cable so the gates actually work. so there is power here. all left baking in the sun, exposed to the elements. now, you paid for but...