Biggest News Aggregation in the World
📰 Brain Computing News

Brain Computing News Today

Fast, Ad-Free News Updates

Stay updated with breaking news from Brain Computing. Real-time updates on events, politics, business and more.

Stay Updated with Latest News

Get breaking news updates delivered to your inbox

Browse All News →

Failing to Adequately Support a Means-Plus-Function Claim Term Renders a Claim Invalid | Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: Claim language is important. Particularly when dealing with software systems, claims may be held invalid as being indefinite when the claim language is characterized as “means-plus-function” under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. §112 ¶ 6 (now AIA 35 U.S.C. §112(f)). That is indeed what recently happened in Rain Computing, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., where the claims at issue were directed to “delivering software application pac...
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Rain Computing Inc Brain Computing சாம்சங் மின்னணுவியல் இணை லிமிடெட் மழை கணினி இன்க் மழை கணினி

Federal Circuit Invalidates Means-Plus-Function Claims For Computer-Implemented Inventions - Intellectual Property

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. Functional claim language—which defines an invention by what it does rather than what it is—can be a powerful claim drafting tool when used carefully. For example, functional language may be advantageous for computer-implemented inventions that are characterized with reference to logical components instead of physical hardware. 35 U.S.C. § 112(f) (formerly § 112¶ 6) expressly permits t...
Samsung Elecs Rain Computing Inc Synchronoss Technologies Inc Citrix Online Federal Circuit Synchronoss Technologies
Source: mondaq.com

Supporting Module Claim Element Requires Corresponding Structure

Thursday, March 11, 2021 In determining whether a claim element invoked 35 USC § 112, ¶ 6, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded that “module” was a nonce term and required sufficient corresponding structure in the patent specification to avoid indefiniteness under 35 USC § 112, ¶ 2.  Rain Computing, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Case Nos. 20-1646, -1656 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 2, 2021) (Moore, J.) Rain sued Samsung for infringement of a patent directed t...
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Rain Computing Inc Us Court Federal Circuit Brain Computing Synchronoss Technologies

Explore More Categories

World News India News Business Technology Sports Entertainment Health Science