I would like to thank sfgovtv for broadcasting this. Please silence your cell fens. Phones. Cell phones. Items today will be on the november 19th agenda. Thank you. Can you please call item 1. Resolution approving the First Amendment between the city and sunset scavenger company, golden gate disposal and recycling company doing business as recology San Francisco, increasing the total amount from 40 million to 48 million with no change to the term that expired on november 30, 2020. You might remember we continued this item from last weeks agenda. Can you please remind me. Did we have a bla report at that time . We did not. Thank you very much. We are back, i believe you gave a presentation last week so right now could we hear from the bla, please. Good morning, budget analyst office. The board of supervisors is being asked to amend the existing contract to increase by 8 million from 40 million to 48 million to cover the contract costs to the end of fiscal year 1920. As we show in table
Phones. Cell phones. Items today will be on the november 19th agenda. Thank you. Can you please call item 1. Resolution approving the First Amendment between the city and sunset scavenger company, golden gate disposal and recycling company doing business as recology San Francisco, increasing the total amount from 40 million to 48 million with no change to the term that expired on november 30, 2020. You might remember we continued this item from last weeks agenda. Can you please remind me. Did we have a bla report at that time . We did not. Thank you very much. We are back, i believe you gave a presentation last week so right now could we hear from the bla, please. Good morning, budget analyst office. The board of supervisors is being asked to amend the existing contract to increase by 8 million from 40 million to 48 million to cover the contract costs to the end of fiscal year 1920. As we show in table one there is an increase from 12 in actual monthly expenditures from 12 to 14 over t
Explanatory document resolution file no. 201909coe. Item for discussion and action. Commissioner sullivan is going to do the actual motion. Thank you. Save your voice. Great. So as commissioner sullivan can attest to, we had a really interesting policy Committee Meeting on these issues. And we wanted to ask cyndy our Climate Program manager to give you a brief outline of what was discussed not nearly in the same level of detail. But as lowell said, when you look at our where weve got emissions coming out, its pretty clear theres not a lot of mystery here. Our buildings are a big part of the story. And where those emissions are coming from, cyndy will talk a little bit about that. But more and more, they are coming from natural gas. And while we will be developing a Climate Action strategy that you will hear a lot more about for 2020, we dont wait for that to be finished before we adopt policies along the way. And theres a particular moment in time now that is very important because the
Ill try to. Joe duffy, dbi. The permit under appeal is a commencement of work not started under a previously permit, soft story retrofit under 34b engineering criteria including plywood walls, simpson walls. This is a renewal permit. So back in 2016 went through a process took them about a week to get the permit. And it was maybe 1,000 valued for the soft story retrofit. They got the permit and didnt start the work. The permit got approved until the contractor was chosen until the building got sold. And then the permit could have been issued in which case the plot wasnt but the permit gets issued, 360 days to complete the work. I dont know what happened in between that time. But then when they came back in 2019 as you heard the option is a renewal permit which is appealable which is why we have an appeal. The extensions on the permits, this permit would have extended for a number of years. We just dont they have to write a letter to say why they start the work. So that didnt happen. Th
Form 1 through 8 item and submits items the 70,000 permits, d. B. I. Is the owner and takes that responsibility. There is an owner in that case. Whether or not public works owns 20k. They will be together in the space in the new world. I feel like that makes sense to me they will be together, which is an improvement. Right now they are in different be locations. How much more coordination is needed . That feels like a lot. Once it is all an electronic plan review, departments will make comments in blue beam and comments with the customer in blue beam to reduce the issues of projects moving between the horizontal and vote vertical world if that helps. It does. I like the idea of there being a seamless Customer Experience. Sometimes for the sake of clarity one dominant agency which sounds like it would be d. B. I. Takes the primary role and delegates appropriately. It may facilitate that desirable improvement in Customer Experience, and certainty as to how do i do this . Who did i go to