Of a renovation from next door only occur when there is construction and dealing with redoing the foundation or building a new foundation. President swig yes. I am kind of leaning towards myself just for comfort for the appellant is that the d. B. I. Do a site visit. And that latch moving down an inch and a half is quite substantial. Theres 10, 12 notices of violation on this. We have written up going out there again is no point. There order of abatement and notice of violation. I couldnt even print that many violations and i couldnt print them all. The question i have here is that the appellant has stated that there is damage to his property. The permit holder said that her building is not responsible and the work she is done is not responsible. I am trying to figure out if d. B. I. Can go out there and see if there was work done on that side. We have that notice of violation. Was there work done on that side . Yeah. So the excavation was done there was. Okay. The permit holder its th
Make sure that this wont happen in the future . Im making sure that we get every permit required for all dispensaries. In the past, i wasnt part of the program, but from my understanding and the path a referral went to the department until land use was approved, then, the referral came back and it was marked approved or disapproved, but there wasnt specific conditions stated explicitly on that referral. Whereas with our referral now, when when we sent those referrals over, there was an explanation as to why they denied them and what they would have to do. Okay. But that thats all i can say. What i also want to say that i personally spoke to Larry Kessler, and Larry Kessler does not remember any phone call with anyone from bloom room authorizing him. At the directors hearing no, and i appreciate that. I dont think that is as concerning to me as the fact and i agree with you as far as and then, the last question, going back to the permits for onsite consumption. Now, the application if i
Seven years. The greater of percentage structure or minimum annual guarantee of 225,000. They will operate a themed gift store called hello karl which is a name to the fog in San Francisco. It will include products from local artists. Hat makers and charles chocolates. The budget analyst rereviewed this list. Can we have the report, please . Yes. So the proposed resolution would approve the lease between airport and mrg with a term of seven years and guaranteed rent of 225,000 increasing each year. Over the seven year term the airport would receive at least 1. 75 million. We recommend approval of this resolution. Thank you very much. Lets take Public Comment. Any members of the public like to comment on item 6 . Seeing none it is closed. Supervisor mandelman. We only got one bidder here. For these leases we have been having difficulty finding bidders. We consider anything besides news stands. It is more expensive for the operators to come in and they have competition from online sales,
Commissioner constant didn ande are excused. We have a quorum. Welcome to the dbi. Youll see a strong tone of earthquake awareness and readiness in my comments today. Tomorrow, as most of you know marks the 30th anniversary of the leoma skwaeurb earthquake ae city is hosting numerous events at the marina, as well as holding a tabletop exercise at the department of emergency management, include within of ie Structural Engineers seok and brop is the terminology for that and the annual duck and cover exercise held at citywide. Thats actually an earthquake event. While much has been accomplished over the past three decades to strengthen buildings seismically. Seismically, we must prepare for earthquakes around the world. With our Retrofitting Program in its final phase, we are at 98 compliance in terms of filed permits and thats quite an achievements. So welldone and 65 completion and that could be stronger but well get there. Private Property Owners have invested approximately 250 million
Section 60 of the rules of the board of appeals. His son spoke in Public Comment. It states that persons who are not party to an appeal shall not represent parties. Suffice to say this process has been an undue burden on myself and my family. I spent in a considerable amount of time trying to resolve this issue at the onset of construction. The appellant is not willing to accept the outcome of the board s decision on the rehearing request is an attempt to get what he wants rather than rely on the board for their adjudication. Based on these points, specifically on the basis there havent been any new evidence submitted that would imply manifest injustice, we respectfully ask for the board to deny the request for a hearing. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. We will now hear from the Planning Department. Mr. Sanchez, anything . We will hear from mr. Duffy. Evening, commissioners. Just on the appellants rehearing request, i didnt hear anything new either. I would sympathize with him on his