Make sure that this wont happen in the future . Im making sure that we get every permit required for all dispensaries. In the past, i wasnt part of the program, but from my understanding and the path a referral went to the department until land use was approved, then, the referral came back and it was marked approved or disapproved, but there wasnt specific conditions stated explicitly on that referral. Whereas with our referral now, when when we sent those referrals over, there was an explanation as to why they denied them and what they would have to do. Okay. But that thats all i can say. What i also want to say that i personally spoke to Larry Kessler, and Larry Kessler does not remember any phone call with anyone from bloom room authorizing him. At the directors hearing no, and i appreciate that. I dont think that is as concerning to me as the fact and i agree with you as far as and then, the last question, going back to the permits for onsite consumption. Now, the application if i
Doesnt the frackinger to impact of a renovation from next door only occur when there is construction and dealing with redoing the foundation or building a new foundation. President swig yes. I am kind of leaning towards myself just for comfort for the appellant is that the d. B. I. Do a site visit. And that latch moving down an inch and a half is quite substantial. Theres 10, 12 notices of violation on this. We have written up going out there again is no point. There order of abatement and notice of violation. I couldnt even print that many violations and i couldnt print them all. The question i have here is that the appellant has stated that there is damage to his property. The permit holder said that her building is not responsible and the work she is done is not responsible. I am trying to figure out if d. B. I. Can go out there and see if there was work done on that side. We have that notice of violation. Was there work done on that side . Yeah. So the excavation was done there was
Reviewing the model of a seismic upgrade, existing units, and remodel of the units. And i was discussing with a very experienced planner, max poutra, on what we were going to do with this basement, and how we could best incorporate this basement into the unit above. It was never intended to do this unit as an a. D. U. Un asn addition. It was staffs recommendation to be a dwelling unit. Im going to go to the computer now and run through a few slides and show you a little bit about this. This is what the basement looked like. It was storage in the back and a row of storage throughout. When the seismic upgrade was done, ceiling heights were increased, and the spaces were improved with windows as you see here. This is what the remodel looks like. This is the angle in the other direction. You can see the staircase that takes up most of this back yard patio. A new steel staircase was put in with grating such that the entire staircase that was there is no longer there. Here is a entry declari
Good morning, everyone. The meeting will come to order. This is october 30, 2019 regular meeting of the budget finance committee. I am chair of the budget and finance committee. I am joined by supervisor stefani and. Four. I would like to thing Samuel Williams from sfgovtv for broadcasting this medium. Meeting. Please be sure to silence cell phones. Madame clerk can you please call item number one. Item one, 191022. Resolution authorizing the department of technology to enter into an agreement between the city and county of San Francisco and convergeone, inc. , for the purchase of cisco products and services, with a not to exceed amount of 70,000,000 for the term ending november 1, 2022, to commence following board approval, with two twoyear options to extend at the sole and absolute discretion of the city. Thank you very much. We have the city chief information officer. Good morning, supervisors. Thank you for having us here today. I would like to start with i think you two ryan rober
Cards. Do any members of the public wish to provide comment on the items proposed for continuance . Ok, for that, Public Comment is closed. Commissioner fung . I move approval of the continuances. I second. Thank you, commissioners. On that motion to continue items as proposed role call . So moved commissioners and that passed unanimously 50. Placing us consent calendar under constituted consent calendar are routine by the commission and may be acted upon by the role call. From the consent calendar considered as a separate item or a future hearing and item 3, case 2019006948c at 650 jackson street, conditional use authorization and 0045 crv, waivers from development standards, i have two speaker card for item 4 and you will assume people want to speak to that item and in order to do so, we will have to remove it from the consent calendar. Shall we hear that at the beginning. So item 3 on the consent calendar, commissioners. Commissioner fung im sorry, any members of the public have fur