22 and others. How much concrete would we need to pour . Im not an engineer but my friends came back and said, well , based on the foundation alone, you would need 1308 cubic yards. The reports that you handed in only have 150. D. B. I. Handed in 150. That doesnt include any of the walls. Im wondering, where is the rest of the special report . The engineer has the report. Wouldnt they be handed in by d. B. I. . Im not sure why they are not there was geotechnical observations during the excavation and per the permits we pulled, that was reviewed by d. B. I. Thank you. I appreciate it. I look at this and i go, you know, this was supposed to answer all the questions i had last go around and it didnt. It actually raises more questions. You know, you look at the sidewall and you look at the back walls, you are about 100 cubic feet short on the tests. The fire issues and im just like, well, im overwhelmed. I would love to see a summary on everything not just handing all the reports and raw d
Stephen chan, the jason neighbor to the west of the proposed project is concerned that the proposed height of the vertical addition is not compatible with the residential Design Guidelines. The proposed alternatives are setbacks to the third floor so that the scale matches other buildings on the block and does not block light and secondly to move the elevator so it does not to match his a little existing light well on the west side. The second d. R. Requester, a neighbor to the south of the proposed project is concerned with the proposed addition is a demolition and should be reviewed as such, and number two , the measurement of the project height is erroneous and exceeds the allowable height prescribed by the planning code and that the proposed addition is not compatible with the following residential Design Guidelines. To his proposed alternative is to limit the fourth floor. Public comment to date, the department his receipt four letters and opposition in four letters in support of
Invested. We have sat in that house for two decades before the codes changed and we were able to make it an a. D. U. It was six months working with a Civil Engineer and in 2016 we waited five months for a cemetery permit based on the plans we submitted. After two years in 2018 and after 22 years of being in that house, the codes changed and in 1996 our n. S. R. They called it an accessory building was rescinded by the city. We submitted new plans and waited another nine months for a new a. D. U. Structure. Were all in. We paid for plans and repairs. Over 3,000 in School Assessments which i love and we notarized a new n. S. R. That says it cant be in the parcel or used for shortterm rentals. We endured complaints and whist whistleblowing conspiracies and we had to complete two n. O. V. S that we immediately addressed and youll hear more about that, mostly for a naming convention calling it a shed. We endured someone stealing the posted permit signs off our door and then calling in that
Good evening, and welcome to the august 7th, 2019 meeting at the San Francisco board of appeals. The president is joined by the Vice President and commissioners commissioner Darrell Honda is absent tonight. To my left is the deputy City Attorney who will provide the board with any needed legal advice this evening. At the controls as a boards legal assistant. Will also be joined by representatives from the three departments that have cases from before the board this evening we have scott sanchez, acting separate do you deputy Zoning Administrator. We also have joseph duffy, senior building inspector representing the department of building inspections. The Board Meeting guidelines are as follows. The board request that you turn off or silence all phones and other Electronic Devices so they will not disturb the proceedings please carry on conversations in the hallway. Appellant appellants, permit holders, and Department Respondents are given seven minutes to present their case in three mi
Fellow commissioners with regard to the building one number of units to another number of units, that kicks in potentially higher insurance. That really again is not in our purview to consider. Thathatthat is a civil issue and between the hoa members, correct . Correct. We will hear from the department of building inspection. Good evening, commissioners. Department of building inspection. The one thing i see that might be a possible problem for the permit holder is she signed an agreement stating they wouldnt have anybody but licensed contractors. That is because it is a multiunit building. They were allowed to pull the permit as an owner. The price is a little low, too. When the building inspector goes out there he is going to ask them to make adjustments to the valuation. Is that a building inspection issue as opposed to ahoa issue . Correct. That will be noticed as far as inspection red flag goes up, new requirement. We dont have to worry about that tonight . During the course of co