You have a quorum. Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, will you please join me in the pledge of allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag, of the United States of america. And to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under god, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. So exciting to get started again. Okay, on behalf of the board i would like to acknowledge the staff of sfgovtv, jesse larson and jim smith who and make the transcripts available to the public online. Madame clerk, are there any communications . I have none to report, mr. President. We are approving the minutes from the july 9, 2019, july 16, 2019, and july 23, 2019 regular Board Meetings. And, the minutes from the july 11, 2019 special meeting at the rules committee. The meeting will constitute a quorum of the board of supervisors. Are there any changes to these Meeting Minutes . Seeing none. Can i have a motion to approve the minutes as presented . Made by supervisor brown, seconded by supervisor m
We do have our enforcement staff here and they can answer that question. Kelly wong, im the preservation enforcement planner , scientific case. There were no penalties assessed because we issued no enforcement, and they did within the timeframe submit a revision permit. And also a new seat of a two ring support before the Historic Preservation commission. Are we okay with the conditions as staff has given them. If we are, the only thing we have to decide on is the dormers we have been told that there is enforcement action, i assume that that means that the people representing the department who are supposed to be looking over this will do so with diligence. I am unclear about the dormer. The architecture said, before you say anything, i just want to clarify my question. My understanding is that this has to be rebuilt per the original h. P. C. C of a witch has smaller dormers. That is not my question. My question is about, you just asked that you are able to rebuild the dormer to a bigg
Clerk. [reading notes] item number 1, 180777, ordinane amending the planning code to require a conditional use authorization for employee cafeterias, as defined, within office space, except for existing employee cafeterias; affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; making findings of consistency with the general plan and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under planning code, section 302. We had to make some amendments i had to set for one week. Anything you would like to add about this legislation . Clerk just to reiterate that we were to considerable amount of time with all of the stakeholders in i feel like weve got most i think we are in good shape. It is an honor to be your cosponsor. Does mr. Sanchez, nothing from planning, is there any Public Comments on item number one . Seeing none. Public comment is closed. If there is no object
And as a city, we have reiterated policies that do that. So i dont want to do that to the businesses back there. So i do think theres some work that still could be done to relocate the entrance of the garage to harrison street. I think that at 120 , the extra b. M. R. Unit is not a b. M. R. Unit. I said this at the last hearing. The market rent for that apartment in the mission right now is just barely above 120 b. M. R. For the past couple of years, the a. M. I. Has been riding faster than the c. P. I. , which is what the rent control increase is based on. So i can see a scenario if things keep going this way, and in a couple of years that b. M. R. Unit will be more expensive than the market. First of all, its business address for your owner because theyre going to have an upside down unit and still have to rent it through the housing and go through the lottery, but to the community it doesnt benefit. So i would like to see, as commissioner hill has stated, more work on that, on provi
Okay, there is no fine for this. Do they have to run the title . Please make sure to silence all cell phones on electronic devices. Replace speaker cards and any documents to be submitted to the clerk. [reading notes] item number 1, 180777, ordinane amending the planning code to require a conditional use authorization for employee cafeterias, as defined, within office space, except for existing employee cafeterias; affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; making findings of consistency with the general plan and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under planning code, section 302. We had to make some amendments i had to set for one week. Anything you would like to add about this legislation . Clerk just to reiterate that we were to considerable amount of time with all of the stakeholders in i feel like weve got most i think we are in good