Of [ inaudible ] these businesses catered to feminist women, whether gay or straight. Valencia street at this time became known as the womens district. Sfl i met susan in 1974 a1974 in 1976. When my brother died of aids in 1990, they were the first ones at my door with a pot of homemade chicken soup. When a mutual friend of ours was diing of aids, susan sat at his bedside. In conclusion, i would like to say that i wholeheartedly support saving the 645 valencia Street Building and approve the project as is. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please, and good evening, and welcome, as well. Thank you. My name is rebecca fernandez. Im cinas wife, and im here this evening to read a letter from the gobt historical society. Dear commissioners, im writing to you today on bart of the Glbt Historical Society in support of the project proposed by dennis and susan bring at the property located at 645 valencia street, the site of the former amelias bar and more recently, the elbow room. Founded in
Verizon r. F. Engineer says i nee at this intersection. We go to the intersection with architects. And look at different poles to t blocking windows . Is it in front of windows . Is there a tree blocking the si . Here we looked at this is the fe we looked at. We thought it was the best locat that intersection because the aa would be above where the windown adjacent property. That building is about 22 feet m the rightofway. While the other poles on that sn the immediate area are closer to buildings. If you go, i think west, the stt starts to go down in elevation. Sow would lose some signal goint because of that. So that was kind of the reasonid this pole selection. What about placing it on buis instead of poles . Its tough with the zoning in francisco. That is preference seven, the Pg Department can go to that. Its hard at the get these on residential lots. Residentialzoned properties, id say weve heard in past, residel properties could provide an alte to placing them on the pole if Com
Theyve submitted a revised project, and the 150e a said in the last hearing, and i think today here again that they agreed with the revised plan, so the president , your motion would be to deny the plan, issue the variance on the condition that it be can he rised to correct the plans and adopt the findings and would that be sufficient to address yes, it does. Okay. So that is the motion, then. On that motion, commissioner lazarus. Aye. President honda. Aye. Commissioner aye. And commissioner swig. No. The next item is item 8, item 7 has been continued. Item 8 is peal number 17151. Cheryl coan with Building Department approval. The property is at 76640th avenue, protesting the issuance on august 18, 2017 to carren bentley and Kristina Svensson of an alteration permit, a rooms down addition to existing residence, no new Square Footage added, all work is within existing building footprint, includes new family room, full bath, hallway, new doors and windows. Neck deck and stair in rear yar
Larger entities are coming in to take advantage of that land use space because its a fairly premium commodity, so the portable permits will allow the owner to be able to transport that permit to another location. There, of course, are a whole set of criteria to ensure that it isnt a new owneroperator during that process, and they have 18 months to find a new location. Also, consumption, so the definition of consumption was changed, so now, consumption does mean smoking and edible consuming or other ways of consuming drinking and will allow the retailers the ability to add that on. There are going to be specific criteria. Right now its being proposed as you have to have a separate consumption room, so again, this is going to be, you know, a bit of a challenge because there are some mcds that are small, and if when they transfer into a Cannabis Retailer, they wont have the room to create that space, so itll be interesting to see what the director comes with in terms of how the portable p
Because the elevator, you know, crosses both property lanes, and physically we issued those because i ended up there during a site visit, and theres been complaints going back and forth here, and then,s ayou know, one side appears to want to keep their half, one side appears to want to demolish their half, so weve got this case of time spent by a lot of dbi inspectors. I went out there about a week ago, and i was actually shocked at the state that this was allowed to get to by two Property Owners. In a storm, this thing could fall out onto the street. So my conscience for the last week has been a better do something about this, because i could be ready about myself on the news some night. People letting this property get like this over a spite or a fight is so spiteful to people like myself that work there at dbi. I dont know why they cant agree on something, but basically, were coming from the safety point of view. Were asked that this get secured immediately, and weve given them the