We go to the intersection with architects. And look at different poles to t blocking windows . Is it in front of windows . Is there a tree blocking the si . Here we looked at this is the fe we looked at. We thought it was the best locat that intersection because the aa would be above where the windown adjacent property. That building is about 22 feet m the rightofway. While the other poles on that sn the immediate area are closer to buildings. If you go, i think west, the stt starts to go down in elevation. Sow would lose some signal goint because of that. So that was kind of the reasonid this pole selection. What about placing it on buis instead of poles . Its tough with the zoning in francisco. That is preference seven, the Pg Department can go to that. Its hard at the get these on residential lots. Residentialzoned properties, id say weve heard in past, residel properties could provide an alte to placing them on the pole if Comparable Service if the ses acceptable. We hear more of t
Today here again that they agreed with the revised plan, so the president , your motion would be to deny the plan, issue the variance on the condition that it be can he rised to correct the plans and adopt the findings and would that be sufficient to address yes, it does. Okay. So that is the motion, then. On that motion, commissioner lazarus. Aye. President honda. Aye. Commissioner aye. And commissioner swig. No. The next item is item 8, item 7 has been continued. Item 8 is peal number 17151. Cheryl coan with Building Department approval. The property is at 76640th avenue, protesting the issuance on august 18, 2017 to carren bentley and Kristina Svensson of an alteration permit, a rooms down addition to existing residence, no new Square Footage added, all work is within existing building footprint, includes new family room, full bath, hallway, new doors and windows. Neck deck and stair in rear yard. Im a single mom. I sincerely want to thank this board and particularly the city of San
Looked down. Judge in the case told the jury dont let bias, sympathy and other factors influence the decision. Charged with Second Degree murder, jury was told they could also consider first degree or involuntary manslaughter. A not guilty verdict is also a possibility. Following those instructions, assistant District Attorney diana garcia made closing arguments insisting that gun that killed kate steinle didnt go off accidentally or was found by garcia serenty under a swivel chair like argued. Told the jury that he had gun with him all along and knew that pier 14 was targetrich environment full of people. Saying he, the defendant, had his own secret version of russian roulette. Defense reminded the jury he had no motive or prior interactions with steinle. If you wanted to injure someone, would you fire from 90 feet away . Gonzalez maintains his client found the gun under the chair. Defense asked jury to draw a conclusion based on this sequence of stills showing people hovering in that
Keep section 1. 127 on the question of 4 4a, the right of private plaintiff to receive 50 of civil penalties. I would remove. Re i would remove that provision. It would be in agreement with staff on that. On section 5 machine 5a, i would go back to the original language prohibiting commissioners and Board Members from fund raising for their appointing official. But not broadening to include necessarily any elected official. For section 6, i would propose a robust disclosure requirement encapsulated in section g. So for section 6, you would propose that we accept the staff recommendation on no, im sorry. I would accept the recommendation rather than changing section 3. 20784 in such a way by incorporating changes d through f. Im supportive of replacing 3. 20784 with a stepped up regime for behest of payments. Youd a do away with the ban and replace it with a disclosure . Commissioner chiu yes. Mr. Chairman if commissioner chiu is finished, procedural, is this going to be reduced to writ
Supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. Super safai i think that supervisor safai i think that item number one is going to be continued. So actually why dont we take item number two, please. Clerk yp two, ordinance of money to require parties to pay a refundable deposit when requesting written findings when the assessment appeals board has established procedures concerning the waiver and renewal of requests for written findings. Unless theres any comments from my colleague here why dont we hear from supervisor peskins and aide lee hel heppner. The proposed legislation before you today is an amendment to chapter 2b of the administrative code with policies and procedures for requesting findings of the assessment appeals board prior to an assessment hearing. As i understand it and this was sort of urged to our office at the request of the assessment appeals board, these amendments codify the policies and the procedures that have been developed by the assessment appeals board with the