whatever they were doing it was illegal and somebody should go to jail for doing it rove says he doesn t believe they are taking emails. all right? i think that s probably true. whatever emails they are taking are not from people in the united states. bill: okay. so you believe that? well, look, i believe it s possible that they could illegally do something else. i m just assuming the program is being carried out legally. that may be a big assumption but i will take it. bill: why do you think they are building this humongous thing in utah. this is what the nasa does. the nsa intercepts and analyzes communication of all kinds. cable traffic from all over the world. i mean, it is a vast undertaking. bill: up until now all they had was a maryland facility and it worked fine and now they are expanding it in a huge way. i understand it because they retain the data. look, the example mike hayden provided yesterday the former intelligence chief provided yesterday was a pretty
it was illegal and somebody should go to jail for doing it rove says he doesn t believe they are taking emails. all right? i think that s probably true. whatever emails they are taking are not from people in the united states. bill: okay. so you believe that? well, look, i believe it s possible that they could illegally do something else. i m just assuming the program is being carried out legally. that may be a big assumption but i will take it. bill: why do you think they are building this humongous thing in utah. this is what the nasa does. the nsa intercepts and analyzes communication of all kinds. cable traffic from all over the world. i mean, it is a vast undertaking. bill: up until now all they had was a maryland facility and it worked fine and now they are expanding it in a huge way. i understand it because they retain the data. look, the example mike hayden provided yesterday the former intelligence chief provided yesterday was a pretty good one. we capture a terr
it was illegal and somebody should go to jail for doing it rove says he doesn t believe they are taking emails. all right? i think that s probably true. whatever emails they are taking are not from people in the united states. bill: okay. so you believe that? well, look, i believe it s possible that they could illegally do something else. i m just assuming the program is being carried out legally. that may be a big assumption but i will take it. bill: why do you think they are building this humongous thing in utah. this is what the nasa does. the nsa intercepts and analyzes communication of all kinds. cable traffic from all over the world. i mean, it is a vast undertaking. bill: up until now all they had was a maryland facility and it worked fine and now they are expanding it in a huge way. i understand it because they retain the data. look, the example mike hayden provided yesterday the former intelligence chief provided yesterday was a pretty good one. we capture a terr
because every time they make a deal with them, he reneges on it. so is the relationship frosty? there is one interesting thing on benghazi. it seems like the white house they want to point all the fingers at the state department. is that on purpose? oh, yes. i thinks. at one point bill thought that hillary was going to be made the scapegoat. he told her, if they do that, have you to resign. they didn t do that examine who has to resign? resign from secretary of state. okay. it s still happening now because she s gone. she s gone. but they are still saying it. i am told from the clinton camp that they feel pretty competent, when all the cable traffic comes out between the state department and benghazi that hillary will be seen as somebody who understood the situation and did something about it. all right. fascinating. appreciate it. coming up, let not your heart be
as i said, you got official americans and private citizens throughout the middle east at risk from terrorist attacks and their continuing safety depends on our ability to provide protection when the need arises. for the white house press spokesman, eight months a long time ago. eight months is a long time if you have the attention span of a fruit fly. gregg: during her testimony, secretary of state clinton at the time said, she knew nothing about requests for more security. she wasn t in the loop. her name is on the cable traffic about that very issue. the accountability review board never bothered to interview her before issuing their report. does that render it s conclusions inherently suspect? it s amazing to me that the arb did not interview the secretary. indeed, there are allegations they didn t interview other people, as well. i suppose some of that will come