Campaign Language News Today

expect as we head into midterm season during a private fundraiser in maryland yesterday, biden likened the maga movement to, quote, biden semi fascism and bn continued his attack cs at the podium. >> i respect conservative republicans. i dont respect these major republicans. theyre a threat to our very democracy. they refuse to accepth refused l of the people. trump in the extreme measure republicans have madmae our choice to go backwards fulld of anger, violence, hate and division. bu...

the wider public through the right wing media concocting with that man, steve bannon, they called "the green bay sweep" involved persuading members of congress to challenge the college electoral results setting off a chain reaction by their theory also by their cockamamie theory lead to stage legislators appointing trump elengthers. months after the january 6th committee made a criminal reseveral navarro to the department of justice, turn over records including communications with dona...

There and says its about up shes using coded campaign language. and she was referring to lan abortion saying take away constitutional rights. ghts, theyre oh blocking our access to b the ballot, which has nevealr been the case. on >> but its a characterization l popularly of the left and thenen they turn aroundd an mock voters that they said they were going to unite. so whether it was deplorable or smelly wal-mart people or chumps, that is a view they have of people who believe in god given free...

This was the president, and i do think it was based on his campaign language. his instincts and, frankly, his not being his predecessor. >> relative to north korea, rocket man, calm before the storm, youll find out. that type of word choice caused you to be concerned that we were being driven to war. the book went to press before some good news has occurred. did you not give president trump enough credit when you wrote the book? >> no, i gave him credit for some things. i actually thought that h...

Goes one step shy of killing u.s. participation in it, trying to send the message that i dont like this deal, but were sort of in there, he says hes leaving it to congress to figure it out. >> heres the thing, he doesnt like the deal and for whatever reason he made a big deal of it on the campaign trail, as if his base gave a damn about the deal or not. with colorful language about how this is the worst deal the united states is suffering, hes having to pony up to that kind of campaign language....

That has to be a concern for the administration as this case is heard in the high court. >> it is. i think this is something the president may be in good shape on. how much courts used campaign language in deciding the merits of this case. i have always thought that the trump administration has a better chance of winning in the supreme court than it did in the lower courts. the supreme court has been traditionally very reluctant to use the presidents words as opposed to the text or order of the ...

Senate intelligence committee is going to focus on just the russia part of this, the collusion, potential collusion and not delve into the obstruction of justice. so over to judiciary, i also just observing chuck grassley over the years wonder if this is going to be an opportunity for him to bring up the loretta lynch material that we had learned recently one would think hes going to want to score some political points for his team there if he opens up talking about obstruction of justice, getti...

Is he literally laid out as the prosecutor everything that shows that hillary clinton was guilty of this, and then at theha end,e takes the role away from loretta lynch and says that there should be no further prosecution. over stepping his bounds, and saying that there should be intent and that the statuteha tt requires intent is totally erroneous, untrue, and not in the statute. >> juan: he said there was no evidence, as i remember. >> kimberly: he listed the whole thing. and said, wow, this i...

Thats what he said. >> jesse: would you like to about that? >> kimberly: i dont know. >> juan: why dont you interrupt. go ahead. >> jesse: i will interrupt briefly. he contorted to say there was no intent. he didnt need intent. she violated the law, and if her name wasnt clinton, she would have been behind bars. >> juan: oh, my gosh, . >> greg: this is the confirmation bias. you have two perfect examples here. you look at loretta lynch, and you say absolutely there is no there there. you look at...

So, all we are talking about -- >> jesse: would you like to hear about that? >> kimberly: i dont know, your cheeks are up here -- he is like this. >> jesse: i will interrupt briefly. he contorted the statute to say thated there was no intent. it didnt need intent. she violated the law,sh and have her name was in clinton, she wouldhe have been behind bars. everybody knows it. >> juan: oh, my gosh. get out of town. >> kimberly: she would have been a goner. >> greg: this is the confirmation bias of...