Case Ami News Today

Reputation in order to get a thing of value for yourself, in this case ami, remember c wwas commanding bezos asserts speech that their coverage of the news issues was legitimate. and to try to thwart his investigation into their activities and, in fact, whether they had anything to worry about. and theyre under an agreement with the southern district of new york not to engage in any criminal activity whatsoever. they have a business interest in forcing someone else to say positive things that su...

With former deputy assistant attorney general harry lipman. explain why the comment seems light it could be significanthe >> well, because the manafort case in particular, paul manafort being a central target of the mueller investigation, has seemed to deal with all manner of things that happened before the presidential campaign, related to paul manaforts work on behalf of pro-russian figures in ukraine, and then sort of pivoting and becoming about his lying after he breached his plea agreement....

You wrote bezos has the ability to use his huge digital reach in all kinds of ways and he may be tempted to do so in situations where the villians arent as obvious. you say i doubt he would, but he could. >> i think all these people could. you remember the gawker and peter teal thing. these billionaires can go off and do what they want. in this case, obviously these people are appalling. >> obvious villians. >> in fact, this negotiation idea is crazy. no journalist does this. this was quid pro q...

Look, its a news decision to decide whether how many times youre going to write the same story. the story was already out there. i think people misunderstand that this was a post publication negotiation to resolve the outstanding issues. >> from a legal perspective, do you think the inquirer can make the case that this was a matter of journalism. this was a news decision? >> its an up hill battle. i think they have an argument to assert. let me say that. the first amendment is an extremely impor...