Page 6 - Casey Decision News Today

Those guardrails. we mutually believe in democracy. we believe that a decision that people make when they vote for the president -- it has to be respected. and all of this acknowledgment has been challenged president trump. then president trump. would i think we are starting to see is that people realize it wasnt spontaneous. it really wasnt idiosyncratic, and frankly, anti democratic authoritarian act by president trump. all of us have to unite about saving our democracy. and we can have those ...

Miranda warning that many know by heart. you have the right to remain silent, maybe enshrined in tv shows and films, but this weeks supreme court decision means its civil rights protections will be significantly reduced. the 6 to 3 decision essentially concluded that failing to mirandize or give someone their miranda warning does not allow a person to suit long forsman for federal civil rights violation of the fifth amendment protection against compelled self incrimination. back with me as micha...

Subsequent casey decision or even this decision. and thirdly, neither has pelosi or schumer, because they would come right out of the box, heres the decision. how do they know whats in the decision in 30 seconds to have press releases and so forth? and theyre lying about this decision. this decision is very simple. here we have whats called the constitution of the united states. not the tax code, its not obamacare. its very simple, about 5,000 words. you can look all you want, the word "abortion...

Subsequent casey decision or even this decision. and thirdly, neither has pelosi or schumer, because they would come right out of the box, heres the decision. how do they know whats in the decision in 30 seconds to have press releases and so forth? and theyre lying about this decision. this decision is very simple. here we have whats called the constitution of the united states. not the tax code, its not obamacare. its very simple, about 5,000 words. you can look all you want, the word "abortion...

He is just reading the card, he has no idea. they say he was just hyperventilating about specifically what you just heard biden say is not true. they addressed it specifically and we are quoting, "nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast out on president that do not concern abortion." got that? so actually, this does not allow them to ban condoms or gay marriage or interracial marriage or whatever. fearmongering talking point. whatever lie they are telling you is a lie. it says that ...

Times of chief justice john roberts. joan just wrote this piece for cnn.com, conservative justices seized the moment and delivered the opinion they long promised. joan, in the syllabus, the cheat sheet, the readers digest of the opinion, you see a summation of which justice stood where. chief justice john roberts filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. immediately after the release, here were the headlines. it was a 6-3 decision. and then a slew of other headlines, it was a 5-4 decision. so...

Pro-bodily autonomy in one area, and of course they are not pro-choice or bodily autonomy in another area. >> tucker: and they hate democracy, the idea of voters being able to decide how they are governed as the worst possible outcome they could imagine. i appreciate you covering this, thank you so much. >> thank you. >> tucker: there are apparently protest that may turn into riots across the country tonight. there is a big one outside the supreme court in this hour. senior editor at town hall i...

Will probably move up that ladder, but when youre trying to feed your family that is going to be number one. >> tucker: have fewer children? not much of an inspiring message from my perspective. i appreciate your perspective. thank you. as we said a minute ago, this is not a surprise. the law, that matters because it is the supreme court we are talking about, the law behind the roe v. wade decision in 1973 was so shoddy and ridiculous because abortion is not mentioned in the constitution, not ev...

Legal reasoning for roe v. wade because there is no legal reasoning to defend so they turn immediately to fearmongering. soon they are going to overturn gay marriage and contraception. watch this. >> i have warned how this decision risk to the broader right to privacy for everyone. that is because roe recognized the fundamental right to privacy. it served as a basis for so many rights that weve come to take for granted. that are ingrained in the fabric of this country. the right to make the best...

Justice said, concurred, that the mississippi ban on abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy could stand. so thats the difference there. and its interesting you highlighted that line, its very rare, michael that the chief writes alone. and that he cant develop some compromise or be smack the middle of the conservative supermajority. you know, hes someone who usually is in synch with his brethren and new justice amy coney barrett to his right. but on this, no, he tried to work a compromise and ende...