you are so sweet. thank you. happy mondaymonday. and hello, kamala. so we heard a lot the wall whent trump was in office, but there s another wall whend t comes to the border issue, the one between reality and what the media will report.e and it s a wall 50 times harder to breach the one trump was building. but finally, it looks like that wale thl crumbling like a wicker chair under ana navarro. we ve all seen the video. ckingw a dozen migrants attacking two cops in times square. the videtimeo seems to have brot through the media moat that protects the left and,ogres shown everyone what progressive policies on immigration reallyiv look like. and it s scarier thanjesse jesse watters without his and makeup. yeah. foppr thosort lae who support ld enforcement, the images have become like the famous rodney king vide o. but in reverse. and it s hard for us to all justalong whe se get when w the people we gave food, shelter and cash, then bea bt up our protectors. and now the
Course if you show up for their deportation or immigration hearing. So at the start of the Trump Administration lost Immigrant Kids, they didnt lose anybody. When hhs tried to check up on these kids with their sponsors, at times, illegal immigrant families themselves caring for the children, 1475 failed to take the calls or even respond to the government at all. So the Immigrant Kids arent lost. Their sponsors just havent connected with the hhs, or made themselves available. But the media want to misconstrue that as losing a kid, okay. Lets do that for a moment. Hypothetically lets just say that thats correct. Obama lost nearly three times the number of kids, the New York Times reporting a 2016 Inspector General report show that the federal government was able to reach only 84 of
children it had placed leaving 4,159 undercounted 4,159 unaccounted for. Correct me if im wrong, i dont remember any Media Lashing out at obama for losing kids or separating them from their families. In fact,
good news, democrats say iffrom you take money from china, you can t be president c. nl bad news. it only applies to trump. y the the oversight committeeveg of the house of representativehs has discovered corruption of foreign influence peddling by a president of the united states. you just can t take any. monet tay from foreign governmei and the president cannot receive any paymentsdent c or gs from a foreign source. this is about foreign and bribes to the president of the u.s. from thltiple foreign governmentshe s and countries. this has never happened before in american history. ifis neverin that information hh to light while he was in office, it would certainly be grounds fore impeachment. sounds like they finally cracked open the lapto p right? wrong. democrats spent the last seven years investigating outing of trump s corrupt and what they come up with. some foreigners stayed a at trump s hotels while he was president. that s it.
i understand why they are making that argument to kind of set the table and try to put this in context of what they view as a politicized decision, but at the end of the day, i think that their legal argument will rise or fall depending on those other constitutional challenges to her ruling. in my view, she has the power to make this decision. many other states the sect does n not the secretary does not. in maine they do and i think she made a strong case that donald trump engaged in an insurrection and does not belong on the ballot. what the higher courts and supreme court will do, that is a whole other question. the political excitement reaching a fever pitch, only 12 days left to go before the iowa caucuses and a week until cnn s republican debate in des moines. the network has announced only three candidates have qualified. donald trump, former u.n. ambassador nikki haley and florida governor ron desantis. haley took aim at trump who plans to skip the debate in favor of a fox
on that will come down. later this hour i will speak with jeff duncan, the former republ republican lieutenant governor. elliott williams, let me start with you. i want your reaction to part of at trump and his attorneys are claiming in this new filing just been released. in a trial about first amendment rights, the government seeks to restrict firth amendment rites. worse, it does so against the administration s primary political opponent during an election season when they have campaigned on the indictment and proliferated the false allegations. what do you make of that argument? it s an argument they ve been rolling out a lot, the idea that the president was empowered to speak and he s being prosecuted on the words he said leading up to january 6th.