Client Privilege Information News Today

how long will this process take all together with the midterms nine weeks away? we will catch up on the key races heading into the fall. the fight for control of congress as these critical campaigns enter their home stretch. we have a live report from uvalde, texas. survivors of the mass shooting last may there that left 19 children and two teachers dead, they return to school today. another step forward for that grieving community. why some parents say, enough changes have not yet b...

tell us what else youve learned. >> i mean, i think its significant especially the photos yout discussed last hou that show just how this was organized. i think a key part of this is essentially them not trusting the trump team because after they had that initial grand jury subpoena that was delivered, you had this filing that was signed by a trump lawyer, name is redacted in this latest filing, so weis dont know based on the filing who it was, but has been reported publicly about this...

peter doocy brought it up yesterday. >> somebody unvaccinated comes over on a plane and thats not okay. somebody walks into texas or arizona unvaccinated they are allowed to stay. why? >> thats not now it works. >> thats not what you guys want to happen but thats whats happening. >> it is not like something walks over, thats now how it works. >> thats exactly what is happening. thousands of people walk in in a day. some turn themselves over, some are caught. tens of thousands of wee...

were already looking at this material, and we have got a process in place to protect it. >> reporter: in a new court filing, doj says it has identified a limit set of materials that could contain attorney/client privilege information. the progress report coming after former president donald trumps team asked a judge for a special master, to oversee the evidence uncovered in the search. >> we have a lot of problems accepting everything in face value thats coming out of doj these days. i...

judge to appoint a special master, an independent third party, to review what the fbi seized at his florida estate. trump also wants a more detailed receipt of what was taken by the feds. and for the government to return any seized documents that were, quote, not within the scope of the search warrant. >> while trump attempted to get his hands on those records, investigators are trying to track down additional surveillance footage from mar-a-lago. according to "the new york times," thi...

Filings, those classified documents from mar-a-lago. and i think had a pretty good reason for going down there. i think make an argument that with regards to executive privilege is where this is all going to go. the trump team is going to make thisak about more than just attorney/client privilege information, a subset of these overall documents and try to make this about this idea of executive privilege and try to insert another trip wire in here but doj is arguing its not necessary. they set as...

In this motion are fairly routine and i think at least defensible. asking for a special master, lets make sure a third party takes a look at these, make sure there is no attorney/client privilege information, executive privilege information, asking for a more detailed receipt, thats normal, and asking to return anything that was seized outside of the scope of the warrant, that was already done here. all of that is normal. but the packaging here is really outrageous. this brief has all manner of ...

We have a committee in the house, the house intelligence committee, before that the house judiciary committee, not even the whole house or the whole congress, you issue a subpoena and you better respond to it and give us everything we ask, no objection. you better give us white house counsel or whatever we want. we dont want to hear of attorney client privilege, separation of power, you give us what they want. is that what the constitution provides. >> quite the opposite. i had a case many years...

We have a committee in the house, the house intelligence committee, before that the house judiciary committee, not even the whole house or the whole congress, you issue a subpoena and you better respond to it and give us everything we ask, no objection. you better give us white house counsel or whatever we want. we dont want to hear of attorney client privilege, separation of power, you give us what they want. is that what the constitution provides. >> quite the opposite. i had a case many years...

They were negotiating. we were kept in the dark and told it was private, secret, and they couldnt tell us. they even fought the disclosure of the non-prosecution agreement, made us go to court and get an order and make the court order that they turn over the agreement they were they are so embarrassed by it. >> so do you believe that alex a acosta is fit to serve in the presidents cabinet? >> i can tell you my client would definitely like to see him step down. one of them is absolutely distraugh...