Clinton Partisans News Today

Shop. paul: clinton partisans are saying, well, this was big enough operation that could have turned 70,000 votes in a couple of key states and therefore the election and they are doing that, of course, that clinton lost the election not by dent of her own miserable campaign but russian influence. theres no way to know that is there? we have a campaign thats loud and countercharges so much information, we dont know how much this would have influenced many votes? >> no, look, i think the importan...

The volume, the number of emails. all of those things removed from the original version to the version that james comey talked about. and, again, peter strzok and others involved in that editing process feels like clinton partisans got their teeth into this to water it down. which hurts not just, you know, it wasnt just about taking on president trump. i mean, bernie sanders and others would look at that and feel like she was exonerated preemptively. ainsley: people were so worried about classif...

Clinton and was not playing -- deal with a low level deck. thats what weve learned from donna brazile. there are factual disputes about the fund-raising agreements, whether she may be confusing two different agreements. theres a lot of fighting going on between the partisans here and by partisans the clinton partisans and sanders partisans. but donna braziles biggest problem is not that donald trump is saying that hillary clinton and dnc rigged the election. its that elizabeth warren came out an...

And they are focused on the new administration. >> yet he is tweeting about it. he cares but he doesnt care. josh earnest said this today, white house press secretary. >> mr. trump obviously knew that russia was engaged in malicious cyber activity that was helping him and hurting secretary clintons campaign. >> so president obama and president-elect trump, they seem to, david, start with a friendly relationship. is that souring already? >> i think thats quite clear. and, don, its quite astoni as...

Ive.org/24/items/CNNW_20161017_070000_Reliable_Sources/CNNW_20161017_070000_Reliable_Sources.thumbs/CNNW_20161017_070000_Reliable_Sources_001887.jpg"/>

Good to have you with us my friend. even the way that was written makes everything about this seem like it was a negative. and yet where is the proof? i know the perception is so tantalizing to us and certainly to the right. you read the book. do you believe the case can be made that there were bribes involved? >> i dont think that the book is a hit job. i think the book is pretty well researched. and i think that it raises legitimate questions. but to your point, chris, there are no smoking gun...

>> im sure well josh when we talk about the orbit to jeremys point, contention has been hes a tool of the right wing. hes theoretically investigating jeb bush. that complicates the clinton camps argument. >> hes a conservative but doesnt go out and fabricate wild stories. fantasies about the evils the clintons are doing, which is standard fare for clinton books written by republicans. the 2012 stock act, im sorry, insider trading in congress that led to the 2012 act. hes a well regarded guy by t...