home. she was shocked when that happened. it turns out that grassley sent three letters. i provided the letters in a link to my column, in which he offered to fly out staff, do it confidentially, privately, take her testimony. this national disgrace, as kavanaugh called it, could have been avoided. but i m wondering whether these lawyers who were recommended by diane feinstein sean: there s a conflict of interest. whether they never told her about it. and that would be a violation. sean: bingo. of the code of professional responsibility. i cite the code sections in my column. sean: she was like, oh, you offered that? thank you. she said thank you to senator grassley. lindsay graham called for an investigate eight of these lawyers. were they acting on behalf of democrats and not in the best interest of their client? sean: great find. victoria brings up another topic here. that is, if you re going to look
home. she was shocked when that happened. it turns out that grassley sent three letters. i provided the letters in a link to my column, in which he offered to fly out staff, do it confidentially, privately, take her testimony. this national disgrace, as kavanaugh called it, could have been avoided. but i m wondering whether these lawyers who were recommended by diane feinstein sean: there s a conflict of interest. whether they never told her about it. and that would be a violation. sean: bingo. of the code of professional responsibility. i cite the code sections in my column. sean: she was like, oh, you offered that? thank you. she said thank you to senator grassley. lindsay graham called for an investigate eight of these lawyers. were they acting on behalf of democrats and not in the best interest of their client? sean: great find. victoria brings up another topic here. that is, if you re going to look
sean: she was shocked when that happened? it turns out that grassley sent three letters. i provided the letters in a link to my column, in which he offered to fly out staff, do it confidentially, privately, take her testimony. this national disgrace, as kavanaugh called it, could have been avoided. but i m wondering whether these lawyers who were recommended by dianne feinstein there s a conflict of interest. whether they never told her about it. and that would be a violation sean: bingo. of the code of professional responsibility. i cite the code sections in my column. sean: she was like, oh, you offered that?? thank, you. she said thank you to senator grassley. lindsay graham called for an investigate of these lawyers.as were they acting on behalf of democrats and not in the best interest of their client? sean: great find. victoria brings up another topit here. that is, if you re going to look into the lawyer feinstein
initiated by the justice department be predicated on some degree of racial animus, and if so, how might prosecutors cross that things to do item off their list? no, i there are separate federal statutes that apply to civil rights violations with a racial animus, and those that are not with a racial animus. there are two separate statutes. i think they re code sections 242 and 249. they would not have any indication that i saw or that i ve heard of, to indicate either in the ferguson case or in the garner case, this was motivated by race. let offer you quickly a theory, before we have to wrap-up. what is the argument is this was all a part an outgrowth of the broken windows police enforcement. the minor stuff we need to hit hard on it, otherwise it grows in major stuff, and the broken windows philosophy has a disproportionate impact on minorities, consequently there is a racial element to going after someone like mr. garner in the way they did.
reporter: i m just hearing you now, anderson. what i can tell you is that the japanese government is saying that they believe the flying vessel from north korea, they did detect it and that it was in the air for just over one minute. now, the plan was that if that flew over japanese territory, if the rocket broke up and started to threaten this land, that the patriot missile you see behind me, it s an intercepter missile, land-to-air, that it would fire off and that it potentially would with try to take some of those pieces down. that was not the case, because the rocket then in just over one minute did break up, according to the japanese government, and then fell harmlessly into the sea. at this point, japanese security meeting is taking place and they expect to have some sort of guidance after that meeting wraps up, some time this morning here in tokyo, anderson. kyung lah, appreciate the reporting on that. we re going to check in with our correspondent, stan grant, who