Page 2 - Commerce Clause Argument News Today

That as well. thats their argument its not unreasonable argument. >> let me challenge the argument. number one, the reason that rahm emanuel said that is because he wanted the president to concentrate on the economy and not get sidetracked into this and emanuel was right because the economy. >> he also argued bill for step-by step approach because he lived through the failure of hillary care. >> secondly the republicans had an opportunity, it seems to me right now, because of all the attention f...

>> bill: thats great. >> argument is tax you for everything do you and everything you dont do. good luck selling that on the other side say we dont do that. >> bill: in november we will make a choice in this country. >> yeah, like romney. >> bill: bernie goldberg on whether i, your humble correspondent, should be chastened from my wrong prediction on the obama care ruling. then is it legal on punishment for those kids who tortured a school bus employee in upstate, new york. see if you think the ...

This is a serious question. i made the point that if you give the federal government this kind of power, all right? then they basically can use the taxation to force you to do anything they want. finance not just about healthcare. they can say you know what? we dont like the fact that you are buying t-shirts from honduras. if you buy a t-shirt from honduras were going to charge you two bucks extra. they can do it for anything he want to do because john roberts, juan, established a precedent. go ...

That as well. thats their argument its not unreasonable argument. >> let me challenge the argument. number one, the reason that rahm emanuel said that is because he wanted the president to concentrate on the economy and not get sidetracked into this and emanuel was right because the economy. >> he also argued bill for step-by step approach because he lived through the failure of hillary care. >> secondly the republicans had an opportunity, it seems to me right now, because of all the attention f...

52%, 39% want it repealed. >> it means that a lot of them say okay, well, fine, its constitutional, lets move on. i would still like parts of it repealed. thats the argument the g.o.p. makes. listen, some of the highest numbers in polling for this we would like some modest reform. >> i think they would like something better. juan. >> here is what you do. bill? >> thats the point. >> if you want specifics, i can give them to you. >> bill: right. they want something better and so far, look. with a...

52%, 39% want it repealed. >> it means that a lot of them say okay, well, fine, its constitutional, lets move on. i would still like parts of it repealed. thats the argument the g.o.p. makes. listen, some of the highest numbers in polling for this we would like some modest reform. >> i think they would like something better. juan. >> here is what you do. bill? >> thats the point. >> if you want specifics, i can give them to you. >> bill: right. they want something better and so far, look. with a...

>> bill: thats great. >> argument is tax you for everything do you and everything you dont do. good luck selling that on the other side say we dont do that. >> bill: in november we will make a choice in this country. >> yeah, like romney. >> bill: bernie goldberg on whether i, your humble correspondent, should be chastened from my wrong prediction on the obama care ruling. then is it legal on punishment for those kids who tortured a school bus employee in upstate, new york. see if you think the ...

This is a serious question. i made the point that if you give the federal government this kind of power, all right? then they basically can use the taxation to force you to do anything they want. finance not just about healthcare. they can say you know what? we dont like the fact that you are buying from honduras. if you buy a t-shirt from honduras were going to charge you two bucks extra. they can do it for anything he want to do because john roberts, juan, established a precedent. go ahead. la...

Kim kardashian was running. the point man, john roberts, had to provide a legal reason, and he found taxation. one man changed the argument, but the chief justice has that power. allen barnes, melbourne, australia. what happened, bill? you pontificated for months that obamacare would be overturned. do you have egg on your face? up to you, allen. i correctly predict the commerce clause argument would be ruled invalid, and it was. no one say the taxation argument coming. maybe i should have. bob s...

Colleagues comments. the chief justice crumbled like a dry cookie here and in some desperate attempt to preserve the court has instead made them look foolish with an unsupportable ruling that is only the law of the land because five justices on the supreme court said it is, not because its backed by any good rational or any intellectual history that traces itself back to the founding vision of this country. >> mike: and well, i want to tell you two things, first, i appreciate the candor of your ...