And it will totally keep us in darkness because it is so large that its just covers up from the front to the back. If the setback is remains goes back to 10 feet, the whole front of it will be in the shade, particularly up until noon because of the eastern exposure, will be totally covered. I thank you for your time and thats my comments. President fong is there additional Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment portion is closed. Commissioner moore. Commissioner moore id like to put to the record that this is a mandatory discretionary review, and the issues, which the Residential Design Team has addressed are those typically addressed in a mandatory discretionary review. I want to say that i think the review is extremely thorough, creative, and supportive of those ideas that are important to us as a commission. I want to comment taking it down from the top, the 15 foot setback from the street is something which this commission has asked the department to consistently implement. I
We will be calendaring a public discussion of that item i believe on the 10th of january. But it was a productive meeting yesterday. Thank you for that update. Any additional comments, questions . Commissioners, under the director arizona report, item 6, directors announcements. Commissioners in the interest of time i think i will pass. I dont have anything urgent to report, but other than to wish you happy holidays. Item 7, review of the past events of the past week. Good afternoon, commissioners this. Week at Land Use Commission there were a couple of designations and both nominations were reviewed by the Historic Preservation commission earlier this year and this week at Committee Members of the public spoke in support of each. There was no opposition. And they were both recommended for approval to the full board. There is also a hearing on the western edition, after the redevelopment agency. This was at the request of supervisor olague. The Planning Department was the only city age
We will be calendaring a public discussion of that item i believe on the 10th of january. But it was a productive meeting yesterday. Thank you for that update. Any additional comments, questions . Commissioners, under the director arizona report, item 6, directors announcements. Commissioners in the interest of time i think i will pass. I dont have anything urgent to report, but other than to wish you happy holidays. Item 7, review of the past events of the past week. Good afternoon, commissioners this. Week at Land Use Commission there were a couple of designations and both nominations were reviewed by the Historic Preservation commission earlier this year and this week at Committee Members of the public spoke in support of each. There was no opposition. And they were both recommended for approval to the full board. There is also a hearing on the western edition, after the redevelopment agency. This was at the request of supervisor olague. The Planning Department was the only city age
Meet last night and one item of note was a rehearing request for Building Permit application dealing with glenn canyon park and before the hearing the request was withdrawn and the decision became final and the Building Permit is approved. Just wanted to inform the commission on that and there are no other reports. Commissioners, under item 814601 larkin street, informational, current status of the project design. Good afternoon president fong and members of commission. I am going to keep my comments very brief here. The subject property was considered in june of 2010 and june of this year for proposal to demolish the church. This commission cited concerns no. 1 about the demolition of the existing church which is considered an Historic Resource under ceqa, but also to do with what i would collective call the compatibility. The project sponsor has been working collaboratively with Planning Department staff and with representatives of the community in an attempt to address staff concern
We are proposing two onsite, bmr units and one inlieu fee. Next, please. I would like to look here. This is kind of like describing the result of the process over the last six months. The major design revisions on the left are all of the parking goes into one basement, with one garbage garage entrance. The height has been reduced one full story, and its actually down to 53. The mapping along clay, adjacent to 1630 clay. Four story against four story the same is true of the larkin. It was at one time a gap that was opening onto larkin between the Historic Building and our new building so this design is now significantly different one than shown to the commission and we have included a Community Room, which well discuss. Its still ongoing discussions about how the Community Room will be used and under what kind of conditions and terms. The Community Considerations on the right were including three Community Parking spaces, which could be either rented or purchased. We have one car shed d