The proposed design apparently stops its building 3. 5 away from three of our Property Line windows in the kitchens of our front units. The new plan though, if i understand it correctly, is that it does not match our light well midbuilding. The new building runs right up to an alongside our building by about half of our light well. This will further compromise necessary light into our bathroom and kitchen windows in our three front units. The plan also completely eliminates one of our Property Line windows in the dining room of our front unit. We need a detailed drawing of exactly how this building will impact our Property Line windows and need to reach an amicably place with this developer. We have asked him to participate in a preop meaning with the city or at least fund that so we can get clarity from the city, namely dbi and fire about what will happen with our remaining Property Line windows that are left. We would appreciate cooperation in that regard. We would like to continue t
Meet last night and one item of note was a rehearing request for Building Permit application dealing with glenn canyon park and before the hearing the request was withdrawn and the decision became final and the Building Permit is approved. Just wanted to inform the commission on that and there are no other reports. Commissioners, under item 814601 larkin street, informational, current status of the project design. Good afternoon president fong and members of commission. I am going to keep my comments very brief here. The subject property was considered in june of 2010 and june of this year for proposal to demolish the church. This commission cited concerns no. 1 about the demolition of the existing church which is considered an Historic Resource under ceqa, but also to do with what i would collective call the compatibility. The project sponsor has been working collaboratively with Planning Department staff and with representatives of the community in an attempt to address staff concern
Sponsor will provide free use of the Community Room with a separate street access from larkin street. And this will be written into the cc os in the building to be available for Community Use for five years. At the end of five years, ongoing use will be determined by what the preceding uses have shown. Next, please. These are just highlights of the basic data. 27 units in the building. The reduction in size has changed the unit mix and size of some of the units and there are now more onebedrooms than before and we have 32 parking spaces, 27 for 27 units, 3 for community assigned and two for carshare. Excuse me. Next, please. This is a little bit burnt out, i apologize, but you have it in your package. The rendering in the middle is the design rejected at the conditional use application in june. To the left is our first attempt at the demasing of the building and running along the bottom there are sequential demasing proposals that were discussed with members of the community, polk neig
We are proposing two onsite, bmr units and one inlieu fee. Next, please. I would like to look here. This is kind of like describing the result of the process over the last six months. The major design revisions on the left are all of the parking goes into one basement, with one garbage garage entrance. The height has been reduced one full story, and its actually down to 53. The mapping along clay, adjacent to 1630 clay. Four story against four story the same is true of the larkin. It was at one time a gap that was opening onto larkin between the Historic Building and our new building so this design is now significantly different one than shown to the commission and we have included a Community Room, which well discuss. Its still ongoing discussions about how the Community Room will be used and under what kind of conditions and terms. The Community Considerations on the right were including three Community Parking spaces, which could be either rented or purchased. We have one car shed d
Dialogue to see this through. You know, there are some questions about the process. About why here here today . Is this because of the suit . Is it because of the judge . I will leave that to you to opine about. That is my testimony today. Thank you very much. Thank you. Good afternoon president fong and commissioners. My name is dawn and im with the middle polk neighborhood association. I come here today with a question that i need to share with you. Its a question that has been posed to me day after day after day in the past several weeks. And that is what process is being followed in this case . And i cant answer that question to the members of our association and the leaders of other associations that are asking me. Is this a new process . Is this a new way of doing things . Will other developers be given this shorter process . Because you know we just heard this case here in june. So were back kind of quick on that. I would like to be able to really fully be able to answer that qu