Be more than happy to take the whistleblower complaints to the public. Might have grabbed his communications i was able to navigate quicker than most and that is the key thing. It doesnt take everyone to do the same thing. Some people might be comfortable just going through the ig and the sun it covetable going to the representative or senator and some light be comfortable going to the press. But there are different levels. You dont have to go as far as we did. In some cases there is an exception that there are different ways that you can get the information out and different people that want to. Theres the civil groups, Veterans Service organizations that would be more than happy to get the information they have direct connections with other leaders in congress. There are different ways that i would tell you this. You feel better when you Say Something versus holding it in. I have no doubt there are employees listening tonight and seeing the comments and i might add that they are prob
Is the way i look at it. The lines are drawn. I thought of that last night. You know, the lines are drawn, the winners and losers are clear. If you two this way, here are the party who is go Everybody Knows what everybody else is going to say. Its all been laid out. And this is reminding me of what it was like in 1995 in cyber law when that was not true. And this is a real opportunity. Its a fabulous opportunity. Just as it was in 19 t 5, youre behind the vail of ignorance. So you can think about rule making and law without the winners and the losers piling in and fighting over it purely as a sort of economic battle ground. It is about the ideas. And it is about the issue. And i think thats what hes talking about. He wants to take that energy here. I dont think cyber law structure is the right one. I think cyber law process is the right one. He talks about interdisciplinary prague mattism. The attention to metaphor. Its ault about how people were thinking about it that could be transpl
Case of the ffm, or the Actual Exchange itself, each component was tested by us independently come a verified, security tested, and it was not signed off in a complete package, so we signed a shortterm authorization to operate, which would be customary if you were continuing to do work on the project. You also mention this information that goes in there is just pinged in there and not stored. How do you identify the person later if there is not any of that information kept . The Social Security number is not stored in the data hub. When you have completed an application, it has this information, and an individual can store that online. That is part of the proofing that an individual can do to store their application. We also have some storage in what i will call the enrollment eligibility in case there is an appeal. What i was trying to say theres no data stored in the hub. We have information on record. I do not think people are cared where it is stored. They care about their privacy.
More than one faith. This case is about christians aggressively imposing themselves on their fellow citizens with the power of government. That is not right. It is not part of the american tradition. Can we get the plaintiffs . Susan galloway. I am susan galloway. I am one of the plaintiffs. I just want to thank americans united for being our attorneys and representing us. I appreciate the justices hearing this case. I think it is important. I feel the town has aligned itself with christianity by just having christian prayer givers. They have had a couple other people but primarily it is christian. That is very sectarian. As a citizen i felt i was different. And because of my own faith and my own religious beliefs. Im glad that the Supreme Court is hearing this. Is there anything what are your religious beliefs . I am a jew. Why did it make you feel uncomfortable . I think that when you have people that, first of all, the town, the pastors face the people, not to the government. It is
To go there says that we have already conclude and there is a benefit of it. And at that point,. And if i could clarify, just, to make sure that we have the common understanding of the facts. That the go Solar Program is a Program Statute did include a section that is a Pilot Program. That Pilot Program was for the first year. So that portion of the program that was characterized under the statute as pilot concluded. I think that we have come into the habit coming into it because the legislation was for ten years. So i think that perhaps, folks are thinking of ten years and that is the pilot aspect of it. And the aspect of the program has concluded that the program and the funding our capitol plan for ten years total. I think that you would come up. And that is a concern of mine is and so now, i clearly understand it and i appreciate that and i only have one last clarification. And once we start to rule out whatever we are going to rule out from this point forward, there is going to be