I think what we need to focus on, whether it is black or white or or straight, making sure that we have Hate Crime Laws like this throughout the country, that protect people like this individual that was brutalized by those four maniacs. To be when i dont believe in hate crimes laws. I dont think we should prosecute people based on their thoughts. You dont think is a hate crime . Tucker i think hate is involved, im merely saying it is a separate category. Im also opposed to lying and downplaying something that is obvious. It is clear that this mans race and political position played a role. Absolutely. Tucker that is not all clear from the accounts that were prevalent today. The associated press, and the first account, didnt measure tl angles. I wonder why that was. I dont know. What i can say here, the charges came down from the prosecutor, the final arbiter, there is no arbiter of the case. People reporting the facts, which is, this individual was charged with a hate crime, this pros
we ll put them on screen for you saying the democratic national committee would not allow the fbi to study or see its computer info after it was supposedly hacked by russia. how and why are they so sure about hacking if they never can requested an examination of the computer servers. it doesn t account for the fact we re learning that the intelligence community is identifying is some of these go tweenz between the russian hackers and wiki leaks. so the president-elect appears to be behind the news cycle a little bit in that regard. it sets up an interesting confrontation we ll see or not see. it s going to happen behind closed doors between the president-elect and intelligence community when he sits down with the leaders to go after their findings on russian hacking in the november election. it is interesting to note that in that room will be the outgoing director of national intelligence james clapper and the incoming national security advisor to the president-elect mike flynn. flynn
intelligence analysts included the cyber the campaign was to disrupt the american democratic process as a form of payback in the obama administration s adversarial position against vladimir putin. last night mister trump continued to question the intelligence community s findings tweeting the democratic national committee would not allow the fbi to see computer info before with tact by russia. how and why they are so sure about hacking if they never requested an examination of the servers? what is going on? on capitol hill yesterday the director of national intelligence james clapper made it clear none of the hacking experts efforts disrupted the votes cast in this election. they did not change the vote tallies or anything of that sort. they can t gauge the impact it had on choices the electorate
interference from them. and i think that s something that he may want to say. i talked to them. there does appear to be russian monitoring of our election, or at least the dnc e-mails. but it did not affect the election results. and i think that s probably what we re going to hear. but you know, he s going to have a really good briefing tomorrow, and i think he s going to ask tough questions and he s going to be given some tough answers. hilary, here s how donald trump responded, or one of the staff members, whoever tweeted, said the democratic national committee would not allow the fbi to study or see its computer info after it was supposedly hacked by russia. so how and why are they so sure about hacking if they never, ever requested the examination of the computer servers. what s going on? i can t believe i m reading a tweet about something that has to do with something this serious from the president-elect. but what s your reaction? that s the problem with a tweet is that i
screen. donald trump is tweeting the democratic national committee would not allow the fbi to study or see its computer info after it was supposedly hacked by russia so how and why are they so sure about hacking if they never requested an examination of the computer servers? what is going on? that s actually a little inaccurate. our reporting from evan perez shows that the fbi was actually rebuffed by the democratic national committee when they were seeking to look at those computer servers so it appears that the president-elect is sort of behind the news cycle a little bit in terms of what the intelligence community is sharing with members of the news media. we should also point out that donald trump has also tweet ld his displeasure with some of those leaks from the intelligence community to various news outlets. and he is suggesting once again that members of the intelligence community are behind some kind of political smear to delegitimize his election victory. the hearing today,