Page 1078 - Conclusions News Today

>> you remember from law school legal doctrine the fruit of the poisonous tree. if that one agent at the center or source is decidedly anti trump and decidedly proclinton, that raises real questions about all of the conclusions that the fbi has reached on any and all of these matters. >> the fruit of the poisonous tree. this is where were at. republicans decided their strategy is to discredit the entire fbi and specifically to discredit robert muellers special counsel investigation. thats how th...

Peter struck was removed from the office after found to have exchanged politically charged texts with another former member of mullers team. well, today the director of the fbi testified in the house and in the house he was treated to republican after republican after republican just tearing into the fbi. >> did bob muller recruit people to his probe that had a bias. >> he was a key player in the clinton investigation. the same peter struck who helped -- was a key player in the russia investigat...

Big deal. moving forward that gets much tougher. >> with the drip, drip, drip. you mentioned the move to discredit robert mueller which has grown louder and louder as this week has gone on and information has come out. its hard to imagine its not a coinciden coincidence. park are what we are seeing is a pattern and practice of mueller hiring known clinton and obama political insiders and boosters supporters to undo a presidential election. that was the election of donald trump. >> robert mueller...

Messages and draw vast conclusions about a biased investigation because of them. if there appears to be a pattern or if these individual private messages are reconfirmed by professional actions, i think then you do have some additional problems that need to be addressed in the forefront in a transparent way by the f.b.i. director. >> sandra: newt gingrich said the f.b.i. became corrupted. this isnt an occasional mistake. this was covering up for the next president so they thought. steven, there ...

Proceeding and then go public and say we fully cooperated when they havent. i will leave that for others when we publish the transcript and i hope at the conclusion we will publish all the transcripts so the american people can see what they had to say and whether it supports the conclusions we reached. >> did you learn more about why donald trump, jr., provided reckonings about the meeting, and if the president of the us knew about the meeting, and what happened in that meeting in furtherance o...

Because mueller okayed the release of this. its just all pretty amazing. >> bob woodward, this is one more piece to the puzzle that bob mueller is putting together and will take his time doing so. youve had a little distance from this. youve been able to step back and look at the day today operations of the trump administration as you write your back. -- book. have you reached any conclusions of your own? >> i have not, but whats interesting, and youve got to kind of look at what trump says hes ...

Ultimately going to bring them down is that they are step by step trying to obstruct the justice being sought here. and that is where mueller and his team are, i think, eventually going to nail them. >> i was 29. i worked in the white house. i wasnt communications director yet, but i took my job very seriously. i was honored to have it. but the white house in which i worked came under investigation for the leaking of -- i talked about this before. the leaking of valerie plames name. and to a per...

True, though he did refer to that violation that lucas marcus just referred to, that alone was enough to get rid of him. but my issue is weve got to decide as an institution of governing and an institution of justice and as a culture about where are the lines about all this? because its not going away. i have believed for a long time that as we move into the 21st century, it will be the century of women. women are going to make more progress in this century than they have in a long, long history...

Hope hicks. to my mind, it doesnt make a whole lot of difference whether he spoke directly to the president or to hope hicks whofwho was presumably on the president in close proximity, they were having messages conversations . just because there was an intermediary who was relaying the messages or talking about what the thinking was and the deliberations were, i dont think that makes a whole lot of difference to the ultimate conclusions in the case. >> as you know, donald trump jr. denied talkin...

Expressed the opinion, you can write an exoneration before an investigation and as a lawyer, youre cool with that?er >> listen, sean. >> sean: answer. >> you have to let the investigation go through. >> sean: they brought the exoneration before they did the investigation! >> you were jumping to conclusions, sean. let the investigation go. >> sean: dana, quick update, i love how you are pro- second amendment. something big i want to get this in. >> sean, thank you so much for reminding our viewer...