Page 1080 - Conclusions News Today

Succinctly earlier with me, is that an impeachable offense? >> well, in the first place, i just told you i happen to be ranking on judiciary, which means im the lead democrat on this. im trying to be very careful as to what i say and what i do. we have to put together facts that are solid, that are very close to evidence, if not evidence, and also draw some conclusions and possibly do some legislation. so this is a process thats ongoing. now, im not without the powers of observation -- >> right....

The white house knew that flynn is under the fbi investigation. they dont know if there is any conclusions that flynn had lie. trumps tweet today had to be taken with a little bit of a grain of salt that it is not the evidence of obstruction that some people are suggesting. >> okay, i suppose it is also possible. you have reported how they were like family members because they got so close to the campaign and if possible if flynn could have told the president. >> yeah, thats possible, right? >> ...

Investigations, this is what -- youfield have to know that number specifically. you would have to have a reason to unmask it. im tending to agree with you on this. >> you already know what he said. >> did you have any conversations? yeah, we already have the at this particular time of the conversation was it the russian dossier that helped unmask certain individuals leading up to this? we dont know this yet. its definitely thought a happy day for the trump administration. im not trying to underp...

I have no conclusions about who it is and how far it will go. heres what i do know, chris, they are getting at it and they are getting at it in an extraordinarily and deliberate and professional way. >> what about the pace, jill? my colleague lawrence odonnell said it was going so much faster than watergate and it does seem like the pace of this is going at quite a rapid clip. >> it is going rapidly. i would like to draw one analogy, which is when john dean pled guilty, it was friday, october 19...

Know that number specifically. you would have to have a reason to unmask it. im tending to agree with you on this. >> you already know what he said. >> did you have any conversations? yeah, we already have the at this particular time of the conversation was it the russian dossier that helped unmask certain individuals leading up to this? we dont know this yet. its definitely thought a happy day for the trump administration. im not trying to underplay it but not trying to jump to these huge i obj...

I have no conclusions about who it is and how far it will go. heres what i do know, chris, they are getting at it and they are getting at it in an extraordinarily and deliberate and professional way. >> what about the pace, jill? my colleague lawrence odonnell said it was going so much faster than watergate and it does seem like the pace of this is going at quite a rapid clip. >> it is going rapidly. i would like to draw one analogy, which is when john dean pled guilty, it was friday, october 19...

What -- youfield have to know that number specifically. you would have to have a reason to unmask it. im tending to agree with you on this. >> you already know what he said. >> did you have any conversations? yeah, we already have the at this particular time of the conversation was it the russian dossier that helped unmask certain individuals leading up to this? we dont know this yet. its definitely thought a happy day for the trump administration. im not trying to underplay it but not trying to...

Low-level aid. conclusions drawn here are based on whether you are a republican or a democrat. >> harris: is our most things i have figured out these days. lets bring in stephen hayes, editor in chief for the weekly standard and a fox news contributor. moments ago i spoke with the assistant ag under george w. bush and he said it is time now for robert mueller to put up or shut up. >> i think this is another step in a long investigation. we will see what robert mueller has learned from michael fl...

Contacts with russia, which could arguably be a violation of the logan act. its never been prosecuted. what was so sensitive about those contacts with russia that could cause mike flynn to risk perjury? >> well, its a very good question. i dont think it would be, frankly, a violation of the logan act alone. and we also need to look at this in the context of this being one of now almost innumerable lies by both campaign transition and administration officials about contacts with the russians. if ...

Question of collusion and everything else. of >> exactly right, so the charges are in that. before the election, exactly right, we dont know. all that we have is the brian ross reporting, and we dont really know what flynn is going to talk about, what he has told them. he has said what he knows about. so, the mueller team thinks that there is something there, but we dont know what. it could be charges against a lot of people. i guess i would caution folks against jumping to conclusions on single...