Page 1117 - Conclusions News Today

Special counsel and at least one committee on capitol hill. thats interesting where the investigation might be going but also interesting about the relationships going forward. these investigations some are considered more serious than others. theres concern about the politics in them and maybe this is a reflection of that. i dont want you to tell people that people leak on the hill. thats our secret. put that into motion. i think the danger here is we try and read tea leaves on the investigatio...

Moment because i think there are people out there who would say what better time to talk about climate change than right now when everybody sees there are these very big storms. but you have people, greg, who say no. >> greg: what you saw there is jim acosta is anti-science. he looked at anecdotal evidence instead of large samples of data. scientists do that and they come to conclusions. theyre never 100% sure. what he said. he does what we get criticized for. look out the window. look what is h...

Very cautious man. i would be surprised if he intentionally perjured himself. but whether there is a doj investigation into this im not sure if thats necessary but im totally on board for comey going back to congress and testifying again because there are new unanswered questions based on this revelation that comey was drafting a memo that was exonerating hillary clinton before that investigation was even remotely concluded before she had even been interviewed in that process. how can you start ...

>> juan: this is an interesting moment because i think there are people out there who would say what better time to talk about climate change than right now when everybody sees there are these very big storms. but you have people, greg, who say no. >> greg: what you saw there is jim acosta is anti-science. he looked at anecdotal evidence instead of large samples of data. scientists do that and they come to conclusions. theyre never 100% sure. what he said. he does what we get criticized for. loo...

Persuaded by the credibility of donald trump jr. >> lets listen to what senator blumenthal said. he was one of the senators in that room during some of the questions. >> there is no basis right now to conclude whether there was collusion or not or whether there was obstruction of justice or not. and that is the remaining area of the investigation that needs to be fully explored. we are a ways from drawing any conclusions. >> mieke, the senator obviously not willing to reveal anything of what act...

Clear he took the meeting and the statement obtained by the "new york times" makes clear he took the meeting because of a phone call, they have dirt on hillary clinton. the presidents son, active player in the campaign and brings in to that meeting jared kushner, son-in-law, paul manafort, campaign chairman and experienced political hand that this is where the questions come from. you know, one of those adults on the left-hand side of your screen should have known better or if they were doing th...

As we can, before we bring in mr. trump junior. >> let me play what your republican counterpart said about the scope of this in a historical context. take a listen. >> im not sure we have done anything like this since watergate. the committees function is to try the assemble the facts as best we can and delay it out for the american people to come to their own conclusions. >> do you also view this as a watergate level investigation and could it take that long? >> i hope it wont take that long. o...

In terms of where they planted those ads, where they put them, who they were targeting? did the russians have their own political consultants saying do this in a certain county in wisconsin, or did they get that information from somewhere else. thats an important question weve got to dig into. >> the president says its a witch hunt, and there are people saying we havent heard anything about the russia investigation, they havent come to any conclusions. it proves theres nothing there. what do you...

Clinton as part of the russian government to help mr. trump and that the campaign accepted that invitation, you would have said youll never find that. no one will put that in writing, and yet, that has been found. so we know a lot more. i think the claims that there was no evidence of collusion have long since fallen away. the question now is what is the quantum of proof here. there certainly is vivid public evidence of an intent to work with the russians to receive help from the russians. there...

Enough. but, of course, we have not just intent here, and again, talking about the public evidence. you have a consistent and concerted campaign to deny and conceal the truth. just looking at that one meeting and all of the various explanations and false statements surrounding it, its a pretty good further intention of a knowledge of guilt here. so a lot more work to be done. and i dont want to draw any conclusions at this point, but the fact that there are all of these unexplained contacts, and...