Page 386 - Conclusions News Today

Know, in the short run, were going to see a rally around him, and i happen to know because i got information on some focus groups that have occurred in the last couple, you know, really in the last 24 hours. and there are people rallying to him. but i think thats short term. longer term, and you know, we dont even know what the charges are yet. let me just say to you, chris, that first of all, i have fought trump for a long time, but im sad that this has happened i dont ever want bad things to h...

Know how to follow the facts and hold people in power accountable. end quote. do. republicans have a point here? now lets see the facts. lets see the indictment, right? nobody can actually say that right now, because we havent seen the indictment. we havent seen the underlying facts. so if theyre jumping to conclusions, because thats what they want to do. they want to defend president trump, regardless of the facts, regardless of the process, so lets let this process play out the grand jury 23 m...

Anything except this. this is the first time in the history of the country with undoubted president and i think thats a concern. republicans agree despite not seeing the charges, but you dont know what the charges are against. from the former what you guys have told us. i mean, thats all i have been reported you jumping to conclusions. i mean, he might have broken the law. is that concern you? we dont think we dont think president trump broke the law at all, but there has been silenced from sena...

Rio its hard to make any conclusions that we shouldnt. >> butan people have a right to know right now and researchers need to study the trends because 23% of mass shooters are on some psych meds. thats a study from voa. so there may be something there. well, we do know thatan antidepressant medications have been linket medid to violent and aggressive behavior, and its on the warning. so when yo on the u read on the warnings, weve put them on our show a while agowh iland its their stark warningsn...

Out of the jail free card, whether it was steve bannon, or peter navarro, or mark meadows, thats not why executive privilege exists, nicolle, it exists to protect branches of government from each other, to protect the executive branch from infringement from the others. it doesnt shield government officials from being held accountable for acts of legality. a significant development here. i dont know what pence means about hes going to review this with his counsel. this is an order to cooperate. t...

Congressman who represents this area, christmas card out, his entire family, they were holding assault-style rifles. he was asked about it today. you see the picture right there. he was asked about this. i want to play for you his response and then i want to hear what you have to say. >> we dont want to jump to any conclusions. theres still a lot more information about this case that hasnt been let out to the public. i think ultimately, i think what this does is highlight some of the mental heal...

To violence. the legal limits of the first amendment. we have played this game over and over with the left drawing these absurd extreme conclusions about donald trumps rhetoric. i dont think it is a proper use of the podium without saying we have now crossed the rubicon when it comes to free speech and incited violence. to me, the reaction is not as important as the actual substance. if you use a justice system to go after your political appointees, that is more impactful and more determinative ...

Small infringements turn into a greater degree of lawlessness. there is a theory, the so—called broken windows theory that describes this behaviour. you lose the attractiveness and security that everyone has a right to expect in public spaces. the everyone has a right to expect in public spaces-— everyone has a right to expect in public spaces. the prime minister will rive public spaces. the prime minister will give more _ public spaces. the prime minister will give more detail— public spa...

Parliamentary procedure, whether thats been followed or not, and whether the accounts that he had given are correct. mrjohnsons critics took a different view. i got the impression by the end that he knows perfectly well. that the rules werent followed. hes always known that the rules werent perfectly followed, - and hes always sort i of tried to cover it up. it will be for the committee to decide if it thinks mrjohnson committed a contempt, and if it was inadvertent, reckless or deliberate. thei...

This particular matter about what boris _ this particular matter about what borisjohnson said, whether it misled — borisjohnson said, whether it misled parliament to that committee which _ misled parliament to that committee which has _ misled parliament to that committee which has been investigating since last summer. which has been investigating since last summer-— which has been investigating since lastsummer. ., , , ., last summer. what powers they have? because its — last summer. what...