Page 955 - Conclusions News Today

Their judgment every day and perhaps they should read and all members of congress should read the ethics manual for congress. the i.g. report said, and i quote, we found no evidence that the conclusions by department prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations, unquote. president trumps and his enablers conspiracy theory about the department of justice and the fbi have been investigated. and after hours today, they have still been debunked. the presidents own campaign mana...

Fi findings that undermines these conclusions under the three intelligence committee. >> i am not. >> the senate committee on the other side of the capital, under richard burr and not split, have made a bipartisan finding affirming the intelligence committee assessment. i want to quote briefly from them that the three committees, the intelligence commission assessment is a quote, sound and intelligence product. let me indicate something i have not known before preparing for this hearing. theyre ...

>> that is the obvious one to conclude from that e-mail. >> ill tell you the one that i picked. >> the one i picked and it breaks my heart to say this about an agent for an agency that i have tremendous respect for, you had no interest in participating in a counter intelligence investigation that was not going to lead to impeachment. that is how i read it. >> mr. chairman, you are assuming someone elses position. you are coming to conclusions on someone elses view points in the hearing. allow th...

Combat people smuggling austrias interior minister herbert kick all is pushing for a hard line approach together with his german counterpart or say offer and at least what they are so again they are calling for a tighter e.u. wide migration and asylum policies but other ministers have expressed concern about the impact on human rights. and yet we use again it might to say has been following that meeting in innsbruck garrick have not have ministers made any concrete progress today. id say one of ...

Information because you were out of scope? >> i believe i used the word failure, which implies in my mind a failed poly. >> i accept that, mr. strzok. i want the answer to the question. the answer came back from the fbi and justice itself that that is the procedure. the next question i have is after the 2016, you did your polygraph at what time. you said you were out of scope. you were brought in. when was that? >> my recollection is the 2016 time frame after that e-mail. i dont know when. withi...

>> sandra: james, catherine herridge brings up a good point by giving us the comparison to what we have now seen. he is about to say in his opening statement to the conclusions of the i.g. report, one of which -- one paragraph addresses the no, he is not, well stop it text message that peter strzok sent in response to lisa pages text. the i.g. concluded imply a willingness to take action to -- you will likely hear those text messages in the context of many questions about to come, james. >> obvi...

Terms. so hear them. we assess russian president vladimir putin ordered and influenced -- and influenced campaign in 2016 aimed at the u.s. presidential election. russias goals were to undermine public faith in u.s. democratic process, denigrate secretary clinton and harm her electability and potential presidency. we further assess putin and the russian government developed a clear preference for president-elect trump. we have a high confidence in these judgments. are these conclusions familiar ...

Because its against our rules. i hope there would be a few prosecutions of people that have been leaking this stuff to the various news media. i want to get to looking at statutes. you look at rules, ive been looking at statutes. somehow along the line, the report on the conclusions of the clinton investigation, the word gross negligence was changed to extremely careless in determining mrs. clintons handling of classified information. gross negligence would mean it would subject her to criminal ...

There was -- found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations rather we determined they were based upon the facts, the will you and past department practice. with that as a fact, there is no reason for this hearing. no reason at all. but it puts it on the front page again and again and again. and as you said earlier, the russians are loving it. because this is what they want. this is what they want. you would think it was benghazi. ...

Of first amendment law, that people are entitled to political opinions. you, sir, obviously expressed your political opinions regarding mr. trump and hillary clinton in text messages to lisa page, and she to you. these were private political opinions which he did not express publicly. >> correct. >> the inspector general found the investigation to hillary "we found no evidence that the conclusions were affected by bias or other improper consideration. rather they were based on the assessments of...