Page 956 - Conclusions News Today

My heart to say this about an agent for an agency that i have tremendous respect for, you as a counter intelligence officer had no interest in participating in a counter intelligence investigation that was not going to lead to impeachment. >> mr. chairman, you are -- mr. chairman, you are assuming -- >> i hesitate in part -- >> youre coming to conclusions on someone elses viewpoints in the hearing -- >> the general aide is not recognized. i hesitate because of my gut sense and concern because th...

Members of congress should read the ethics manual for congress. the i.g. report said, and i quote, "we found no evidence that the conclusions by department prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations." president trump and his enablers conspiracy theory about the department of justice and the fbi have been investigated. after hours today, they have still been debunked. the presidents own campaign manager is currently sitting in jail. awaiting trial on multiple charges. ther...

Jody jennifer has worked with the president on this, he is u.s. attorney, i just got a chao see the paperwork at 3:00 yesterday, i had to rekindle my security clearance so you cant expect me to know all of this stuff in just a few hours, do you buy that excuse? >> of course not. lisa page is going to come and if she testifies she is going to lie because its the only way she could possibly explain the text messages between her and peter strzok and the other people in the fbi. this is a simple cas...

Whatever is necessary to do it in concert with the president. attack the fbi. attack the department of justice. undermine the rule of law. so your e-mails are a perfect foil for this effort. theyre not interested in hearing your context. its not about you. its about protecting the president. my colleagues have acted more like theyre on the defense team for donald trump than exercising their very serious oversight responsibilities as members of these committees. robert mueller was praised to the ...

And corrupt case ever. joe did joe digenova worked wie presidents finest. he joins us now. she said, i just got a chance to see the paperwork at about 3:00 yesterday. i either rekindle my security clearance because i had resigned. you cant expect me to know all the stuff in just a few hours. lisa page is going to come and if she testifies she is going to lie. its the only way she can possibly explain the text messages between her, peter strzok and the other people and the fbi. this is a pretty s...

Correct statement of key first amendment law, that people are entitled to political opinions. now, you, sir, obviously expressed your political opinions as to mr. trump and hillary clinton and various others in text messages to lisa page. >> i did. >> and she to you. >> yes. >> and these were private political opinions. >> yes. >> which you did not express publicly. >> correct. >> and the inspector general found with respect to the investigation into hillary, quote, we found no evidence that the...

Because its against our rules. well, i hope there would be a few prosecutions of people out of justice that have been leaking this stuff to the various news media. now, i want to get to looking at statutes. you look at rules. ive been looking at statutes. and somehow along the line, in the report on the conclusions of the clinton investigation, the word "gross negligence" was changed to "extremely careless" in determining mrs. clintons handling of classified information. now, gross negligence wo...

And gave rise to accusations of bias and preferential treatment, unquote. then i would guess that mr. strzok knows chris swecker, who spent 24 years with the fbi and retired as the head of all the fbi criminal investigations. and mr. swecker wrote, he said, the ig report presents jarring evidence of political bias by the fbi against republican presidential candidate donald trump but fails to add it all up to come to the inevitable conclusion that political bias was there. this is like saying one...

Usually speak in such absolute terms so hear them. we assess russian president vladimir putin ordered and influenced campaign in 2016 aimed at the u.s. presidential election. russias goals were to undermine public faith in the u.s. democratic process, denigrate secretary clinton and harm her electability and potential presidency. we further assess putin and the russian government developed a clear preference for president-elect trump. we have a high confidence in these judgments. are these concl...

That were investigated. there was found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were effected by bias or other proper considerations. they were based on the prosecutors assessment of the facts, the law and past department practice. with that as a fact, theres no reason for this hearing, no reason at all but it puts it on the front page again and again and again. as you said earlier, the russians are loving it, because this is what they want. this is what they want. youd think it was ...