Page 995 - Conclusions News Today

Hicks. in a statement issued this morning, donald trump jr. seemed pleased with the release saying the public can now see that for over five hours i answered every question asked and was candid and forthright with the committee. the fallout on capitol hill regarding the document dump is split along party lines. to republicans the testimony is consistent with what weve heard, but to democrat they say the interviews raise more questions than answers. >> do you still have questions about the extent...

Has made this u-turn in u.s. policy away from a bipartisan consensus in u.s. policy, and the conclusions of his own administration even just last month, there is no indication that that has anything to do with the chinese government having funded this project that the trump organization is invested in overseas. but there is a reason why presidents in the past had those kinds of business interests and havent accepted that kind of foreign financing for anything theyre involved in so as to avoid th...

Happened in that meeting in june of 2016. >> theyll only know what weve been told, and thats all we know. >> are you satisfied? do you know the whole story now? >> im satisfied that we got a lot of collaboration by different people that were there, and they seemed to draw the same conclusions. >> the extent to which the trump organization is communicating with the russians, do you think the release of the transscripts answer the questions? >> well, we have put out some information today as well ...

Now somewhat inexplicably president trump has reversed policy on that company. he has declared he wants to help that company, despite previous bipartisan conclusions that zte was a threat despite decision by the trump administration just last month that they should be fined more than a billion dollars and banned for seven years from buying any parts from the united states. congressman adam schiff joins us live. thank you very much for being with us. much appreciated. >> thank you. >> what was th...

It didnt tell us anything we didnt already know. this program has been around since day one, and this program didnt really advance the argument as to the evidence that proves it. wolf, i promise you there is not a single shred of new evidence as to what happened to that plane. there is lots of extrapolation, there is lots of conclusions and people thinking if you take one and one it must equal two, but was it nefarious? was it mechanical? was it something else? we still do not know. having said ...

Thats not a political conclusion. its a scientific one, though you probably havent read it in the paper recently for some reason, why? judith currie is founder and president, also a climatologist and coauthored the new study, she joins us tonight. professor, thanks for coming on. >> thank you for inviting me back. >> tucker: we are grateful to have you. simply because we are told that the science is what matters. we have a new scientificly development.ol it doesnt mean, im not overly drawing the...

Exaggerated by 40% or more. thats not a political conclusion, its a scientific one, though you probably havent read it in the paper recently for some reason, why? the founder and president, also a climatologist and coauthored the new study, joins us tonight. thanks for coming on. >> thank you for inviting me back. >> tucker: we are grateful to have you. simply because we are told that the science is what matters. we have a new scientific development. it doesnt mean, im not overly drawing the con...

But that hasnt really changed the narrative about the alarm over this issue. >> tucker: i guess the reason this is so very significant to ordinary people is, huge public policies are based on these models, the amount of proposed carbon tax for example. all the ways we are responding to global warming are based on these models, so shouldnt our policymakers paying close attention to whether they are right or wrong?lo >> yes. the conclusions that have been drawn from these models have been way over...

The climate models may be running too hot. but that hasnt really changed the narrative about the alarm over this issue. >> tucker: i guess the reason this is so very significant to ordinary people is, huge public policies are based on these models, the amount of proposed carbon tax for example. all the ways we are responding to global warming are based on these models, so shouldnt our policymakers paying close attention to whether they are right or wrong? >> yes. the conclusions that have been d...

The atmosphere. thats a big oversimplification of the real situation. >> tucker: but isnt that theea opposite of science? isnt science allowing the data to form your conclusions rather than try to superimpose your conclusions on the data? >> well, nature has conducted the experiment for us. since about 1850, carbon dioxide has increased by 40% and during that same time, temperatures have warmed by about 2 degrees fahrenheit, and if you look at that data and combine it with what we know about oth...