individual s names in this report. the bar associations across the country, local bar associations have to step up. local prosecutors have to step up the accountability piece is the piece here, and that is what folks will be looking for. we certainly will, symone thank you. if you are just joining us right now i m stephanie ruhle. it is midnight on the east coast and i am on the west coast, we are continuing our breaking news coverage of the release of the january 6th committee s final report on the siege of the capital and donald trump s effort to change the results of the 2020 election. it was made public just over an hour ago, it totals 845 pages. what is the first passage all about? the big lie. with that, let s get smarter with a lead off panel, former you new york prosecutor in civil rights attorney charles coleman. pulitzer prize-winning reporter for an joyce vance, who spent 25 years as a federal prosecutor and symone sanders-townsend still with us along with stua
that we have already seen to this. we cannot compare watergate, just this really was the beginning and the plot for what would ve been a civil war, a small version on january 6th. and that is laid out even in the first few pages of this document. from a legal standpoint, from a principled standpoint, it absolutely has to be taken seriously. it is not just an indictment on democracy, sorry an indictment on the republican party, it is as clear statement on how these people will go to any and many lengths to literally dismantle american democracy. and that is no laughing matter. katie, in 845-page report that is now sitting in the lap of the department of justice. jack smith, a report like this isn t like a pot potato that they now have to deal with or do they just get a winning lotto ticket? there are all sorts of details in this thing. i think based on in the summer over the election in the fall and now more recently the subpoena sent out to the fake electors plot i don
but the way it is laid out in the report, what it really sounds like is that eastman was the front man who communicated with trump but the actual architect of this big, most likely illegal scheme, was chesbrough. if that is the case what are the consequences for him look like? i have to tell you, when you said this is important for the history books, that just does not feel like enough. okay. what first of all, whatever eastman is looking at, chaz burrow is looking at. if you could call it this for such a harebrained scheme, he is the brains behind their job and it really is him that comes up with these crazy theories about phony electors and alike. so he is in the same hot water, maybe even a little hotter as a matter of conspiracy law then is eastman. that is serious stuff and it is a little interesting that the committee did not really
like? i have to tell you, when you said this is important for the history books, that just does not feel like enough. okay. what first of all, whatever eastman is looking at, chaz burrow is looking at. if you could call it this for such a harebrained scheme, he is the brains behind their job and it really is him that comes up with these crazy theories about phony electors and alike. so he is in the same hot water, maybe even a little hotter as a matter of conspiracy law then is eastman. that is serious stuff and it is a little interesting that the committee did not really fronted in the way that they did with eastman. i think that is because they had eastman more solid from the opinion of a federal judge, seeing to let him out. chaz burrow absolutely is of an equal rank and guild for exactly the same reasons as