Page 3 - Constitution Orders News Today

The ongoing hearings regarding the petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370, which granted special autonomy to the region of Jammu and Kashmir, reached their ninth day today. The...

New Delhi: The Supreme Court Tuesday termed as ”unacceptable” the submission that Article 370 of the Constitution ceased to operate once the term of the constituent assembly of...

The remark by a five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud came when senior advocate Dinesh Dwivedi, appearing for intervenor Prem Shankar Jha, argued that nothing of Article 370, which accorded special status to the erstwhile state, survived once the Constitution of J-K was enacted on January 26, 1957 and the term of the states constituent assembly ended.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday termed as unacceptable the submission that Article 370 of the Constitution ceased to operate once the term of the constituent assembly of Jammu and Kashmir ended in 1957 after drafting the states constitution.

The Supreme Court Tuesday termed as "unacceptable" the submission that Article 370 of the Constitution ceased to operate once the term of the constituent assembly of Jammu and Kashmir ended in 1957 after drafting the state's Constitution.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court Tuesday termed as

A five-judge Constitution Bench presided by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud also said that “judicial review” of the Centre’s action “will be confined to a constitutional violation...” and cannot be about the wisdom of the decision.

There were no impediments in running an administration in Jammu and Kashmir which could be removed only if Article 370 was removed, argues senior advocate Dushyant Dave on Day 7 of In Re Article 370 hearings, reports Gursimran Kaur Bakshi.

SC Says Its Ambit Is To See Whether Repeal Of Provisions In August 2019 Amounted To “Constitutional Violation” New Delhi: Amid arguments that Article 3470 was not just a letter but the beliefs of the people of Jammu and Kashmir, the Supreme Court of India on Thursday said that its ambit was to see whether the repeal of the provisions in

A five-judge Constitution Bench presided by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud also said that “judicial review” of the Centre’s action “will be confined to a constitutional violation...” and cannot be about the wisdom of the decision.