Page 456 - Contempt News Today

Where do we stand?— where do we stand? well, we are in this situation — where do we stand? well, we are in this situation where _ where do we stand? well, we are in this situation where it _ where do we stand? well, we are in this situation where it certainly - this situation where it certainly looks pretty clear that the prime minister has broken the ministerial code, notjust in one way, but two ways. the ministerial code requires ministers to comply with the law and requires ministers not ...

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday issued notice on a contempt petition moved by advocate-activist Amit Sahni against North Delhi Municipal Corporation (North MCD) officials for allegedly raising the construction of the permanent structure in the shape of the Tehbazari kiosk on the pavement at Karol Bagh.

Now is not the time. 0pposition parties disagree. in parliament, at the moment, there is no difference of approach in relation to standing up for ukraine across the conservative party or across all parties, by the way. so, if this prime minister were to make any difference to the political approach the ukraine crisis, so he is using that, really, as a shield. but he and others have limited options to act. we have reached the point where it may be that tory mps have to take actions into their own...

Investigation to determine whether the prime minister lied to fellow mps and to the house, and that is what underlies all of this isnt it? it is, absolutely. the prime minister and all ministers are covered by the ministerial code and thatis covered by the ministerial code and that is very clear that if any minister inadvertently misleads parliament, they must seek to correct the record as soon as possible, but if any minister knowingly misleads parliament then they would be expected to offer th...

Is whether the prime minister lied to parliament and that is what caroline lucas is trying to get at. and other mps are calling for a more serious investigation to determine whether the prime minister lied to fellow mps and to the house, and that is what underlies all of this, isnt it? it is, absolutely. the prime minister, all ministers, are covered by the ministerial code and that is very clear that if any minister inadvertently misleads parliament, they must seek to correct the record as soon...

Bannon may argue that former President Donald Trump gave him "a grant of authority" to "engage in illegal activity" by defying his January 6th committee subpoena.

>> the most interesting thing to me these texts show they knew they had nothing. they knew they had no actual evidence of voter fraud and you can see them going through the process. theyre saying, boy, we really need to have some evidence to move forward here. then you see that moving to, uh-oh, we dont have any evidence and you see they carried on with this effort anyway, to steal the election with this fraudulent effort to claim there was voter fraud even though they had no evidence, and thats...

The american rescue plan. the largest infrastructure law, comprehensive xe rollout, and our economy, while complicated, is in recovery. theres a lot of great things. do democrats need to do a lot of a better job selling these winds? >> thank. you know. some democrats need to shut up and quit saying that the president has not done anything, because he has had a lot. if you look at his approval rating just among democrats, its 15 to 20 points below where it should be. and a lot of that is about th...

Committee, and come forward either voluntarily or by subpoenas issued to them from the committee, they have chosen to do the right thing. to show up, to speak to congress, and provide information. you showed pictures of three specific people who have refused to do that, and who we have contempt charges against. because apparently, there are some people who are close to the situation, or close to the former president, you would think that they are above the law, and that they dont have to show, u...

You about what happened today with the january 6th investigate. obviously, these interviews today, with the white house counsel and his deputy from the trump year, former white house counsel, they were behind closed doors and i know you cant tell us specifically what was discussed but can you tell us anything about the fact that they decided to speak with you, particularly given the claims of privilege that so many other trump officials have used to try to avoid the committees questions? >> rach...