Page 634 - Contempt News Today

Said, you know, in terms of steve bannon, he could drag this on. he would never be held in contempt, never with prosecuted by the trump justice department, but those days are over. thats a clear message from the congressman, but i wonder, elliott, do you see signs that things are different under a biden justice department that you will see different action from attorney general merrick garland? >> quite possibly. you would normally give the witness an opportunity to at least show up. common sens...

More on that journey shortly. we begin with breaking news and a countdown to answers or if answers arent forthcoming to consequences. another big subpoena from the house select committee on january 6th is for jeffrey clark, the justice department official whom the president wanted to make acting attorney general as part of his scheme to overturn the election. it concerns steve bannon and cash patel both scheduled to give depositions tomorrow. the committee has threatened to bring criminal contem...

National anthem controversy, in which the justice said "those who nail during exemption showed contempt for government that has made it possible for parents and grandparents to make easier lives." what do you think, greg? five years later. >> greg: select, i tell you! what are we, in a 1950s detective pulp novel? how much more proof do you need that the left has their thumb on every scale? this is especially amazing, because she dismissed a supreme court justices cogent the pain and is a product...

Vote to hold him in contempt, that should be pretty quick, pretty easy to do and then from there, they have a couple of options. they could refer that contempt citation to the department of justice and ask the department to prosecute him criminally for contempt. they could decide to pursue it in civil court, federal court and in the same way that they went after trump and other trump associates during the prior administration to try to enforce subpoenas that or they could send the sergeant in ar...

Box in all of this is what was the presidents role. we know some of the things about what the president did, certainly propagating the big lie before that day, what he did at the rally that day. but what was going on at the white house? what did he know in advance of january 6th about who was coming to this rally, the presence of white nationalist groups, the propensity for violence? why didnt reinforcements come in to protect the capitol more quickly? thats the biggest unknown. what was the pre...

Bader ginsburg. katie couric cut out part of the interview to protect ginsburg. a law professor and a fox news contractor, hello to you. lets catch up the viewers here. heres the part of the interview that aired. this is part of an article that katie couric wrote for yahoo from 5 years ago. >> i think its dumb for them. its disrespectful. the same answer if you asked me about flag burning. >> bill: ginsburg was 82. the daily mail rote it up here. katie couric wrote she edited out where ginsburg ...

Columnist for the hill. kirk making the bomb shell claim in her new member, saying that she made the edits because she wanted to protect the liberal justice from public back lash. explaining that ginsberg was, quote, elderly and probably didnt understand the question about the take a knee protest in the sports world. here is some of that interview that aired initially. >> when it comes to these football players, you may find their actions offensive but what youre saying is its within their right...

Contempt. they could decide to pursue it in civil court, federal court, in the same way that they went after trump and other trump associates during the prior administration to try to enforce subpoenas. or they could send the sergeant at arms out to grab mr. bannon and hold him in jail and on the hill, which is highly unlikely to happen. so, all of those things take a lot of time. thats what mr. bannon is gambling for right now. he knows hes not going to win legally, but hes gambling that he can...

Exercise. >> if they want to be stupid, there is no law -- >> but couric cut the lay justices more inflammatory remarks saying they were showing contempt for the government that made it possible for their parents and grandparents to live a decent life. the daily mail reports based on courics forthcoming memoir that she acknowledges having lost a lot of sleep over the decision and felt that racial justice was a blind spot for ginsberg which is why her comment was controversy over the day after th...

The breaking news, another big subpoena from the house select committee on january 6th. its for jeffrey clark, the justice-department official whom the president wanted to make acting-attorney general as part of his team to overturn the election. the countdown concerns former trump adviser steve bannon and former-pentagon official cash patel, both scheduled to give depositions to the committee tomorrow. bannon, so far, has refused to cooperate. the committee has threatened to bring criminal cont...