take a stand against 76% of what americans think is right. several republicans and democrats including my first guest tonight, california senator harris spent the weekend making statements and tweeting strong opposition to president trump ending daca. but in trump s mind, there was the looming headline that appears in breitbart today if the president did nothing about daca, and then, of course, there was the president himself. the candidate who campaigned on ending daca had only this to say when last asked about it on friday. should d.r.e.a.m.ers be worried? we love the dreamers. the president would delay a final big decision on daca for six months, an immigration hard
liner told the new york times he s being pulled in a bunch of different directions and because he doesn t have any strong anchor or deep knowledge of the issue, he ends up sort of not knowing what to do. i think the fact that they did nothing to it suggests that they had no idea what to do. that was an assumpt
candid views of this president. you talk to them one on one, they re pretty up front about the fact that they don t take all the president s words to heart. that they are kind of getting used to how he conducts himself and his disregard for the facts. and that s a remarkable thing for an american president, members of his own party, in the congress to say. it s where we are. and i m kind of used to it too now, because you talk to members of the congress. and in private, they don t even bother offering a defense of this president. they acknowledge he says things that are not true. look at what bob corker told us a few months ago in that interview, where he really broke with the president. he said the president tweets things that are not true, you know it, i know it, he knows it,
damage to the fabric of american democracy, and that s an extraordinary thing for them to say. yeah. but yet they won t say it publicly. here s what i have to ask you, and one of the main reasons i m as
this letter which is dated today is written from president trump s attorney to judge wood who will be overseeing a very high stakes hearing tomorrow in new york about all those ver sensitive materials that were seized by the fbi in the raid of michael cohen s office, of his hotel room and his home as well as the seizure of his phones and this is something that i don t think has ever been said before, at least not to to my knowledge on the news. the president of the united states is offering to make himself personally available for any review or screening of the evidence that the fbi seized of his lawyer. it s an unusual offer to say the least and with that let me get right to a well assembled panel. senator richard blumenthal, former senator byron dorgen and eugene robinson from the the washington post which has broken some of these stories your colleagues have. i ll go down the line.
dealer s choice on which aspects of this you want to speak to and, senator, your view of what app
It with righteous indignation because they have the justification with the facts and the law as opposed to what this ministration has done. i think a lot of people believe that. the trump justice department will be justified in following the facts. whatever they lead into that laptop, whether that s leading to the big guy and that wouldn t be revenge, that would be following the facts. thank he was always for your analysis. thank you jesse. jesse: johnny goes to hunter biden s gun trial. what does the biden name mean it is part of town? it used to stand for something but the last year or so, not really.
Election. as the clock klatt down to the next election, the prosecution is speaking a speedy trial. the trump campaign is basically the oj bronco chase at this point. running for his own freedom. to quote maggie haberman of the new york times their goal is for trump to win the election, so parts of the cases can be disappeared by the trump justice department. the stakes of this trump indictment. they join me now. your headline, ali, for trump, states the 24 election can t win or go to jail. trump s lawyer i m about to be president again. he s got nothing else to fall back on. i felt the big take away from the arraignment was everyone s on the same page with this. there is not even a pretense otherwise. is it going to happen early enough? what was your take away by the updates exchange and the effect that was brought up? trump s campaign for
We were told the 1023 didn t exist until it came forward. then you have comer digging into all of these different bank accounts. in one of those pieces of evidence, it says they ll never find the $5 million we gave to one biden and the $5 million to it because they have this intricate set of all of these bank @counts, which was substantiated of where the money was going following the money is the best way to get evidence. it s a bit of a stretch on your part to suggest that there isn t any evidence here. there aren t numbers here. there s a lot of explaining that the bidens have to do of what has been uncovered here, juan. let me respond to you. that 1023 comes from secondhand information from a source, right? secondhand. it s not first hand. secondly, what you get is, it was never ever proven out by because it was reviewed by the trump justice department, the trump appointed head of the fbi looking at it. they came to the conclusion
A lot of smoke coming out of that white house now and we need to keep on investigating it. joe biden is compromised, then this country is in dire straits. harris: top oversight committee democrat jamie raskin arguing republicans don t care about the accuracy of these allegations, evidently their political utility. let s see about that. republican congressman andy biggs who sits on the oversight and judiciary committees is in focus. we begin with fox correspondent rich edson. good morning, harris, white house officials are dismissing the claims in this document. they say republicans are reckless and partisan for even releasing it. the white house spokesperson tells us, quote, these claims have reportedly been scrutinized by the trump justice department. a trump appointed u.s. attorney and full impeachment trial of the former president that centered on these very issues and over and over again they have been found to lack credibility. it is clear that congressional
He writes in part that these claims have been scrutinized by the trump justice department and the u.s. attorney and therefore the impeachment trial of the former president that centered around these very issues. over and over again they have been found to lack credibility. congressional republicans today meanwhile at least a freedom caucus contingent are calling for impeachment against the president listen to this. i don t think it s any secret that i would vote for an impeachment, but people ask why, and i think there is this frustration that they know that the senate is never going to remove him from office. the next thing is they can move them into an impeachment inquiry and that gives congress more teeth to actually get more investigators and more subpoena power and go through and add to this. democratic minority leader jeffrey says that it impeachment inquiry is nothing more than a pipe dream.
andy mccarthy and clay travis are on deck. gillian turner is here first. hi, martha. we just heard from president biden after the document was made public. yesterday the white house weighed in. they re leaving this statement that says these claims have reportedly been scrutinized by the trump justice department. over and over again, they have been found to lack credibility. congressional republicans today at least the freedom caucus contingent are calling for an impeachment inquiry. listen. so i d vote on impeachment. you can move it to an impeachment inquiry. that gives congress more teeth
Paula reid joining us now. this is complicated. everyone thinks they know of the defamation case. there s more than one. let s go through this chronologically. several years ago when trump was in office e. jean carroll alleged he raped her in a department store in the mid 90s. while he was president he responded to this denying the allegation and saying she, quote, wasn t his type. then she sued him for defamation. the trump justice department and attorney general bill barr said, wait a second, as president he has immunity. he can t be sued for things he says while president. that was controversial, but what was more surprising is when president biden was elected and we had a new attorney general, a new justice department, they agreed. they agreed to uphold this immunity protection. now the biden justice department is changing their mind.