Page 678 - Contempt News Today

All-in strategy for democrats. so rather than working we are palins to try -- republicans to try to advance an america first agenda, democrats are wholly obsessed with delegitimizing the president. and if that i.g. report was in any way vindicating of jim comey, then the bible vindicated judas. because you saw -- [laughter] over and over again the work of jim comey criticized and the bias reflected. really, look, these arent just small mistakes that were made, this is the alteration of evidence....

Impeachment of a u.s. president, history is on track to repeat itself, but with notable differences. we take a look back at bill clintons impeachment process to see what might be in store. >> one gavel drops and others will follow as congress sets the stage for the third impeachment trial in american history. the fourth time congress has considered removing a president. the impeachment process for president trump is drawing strong comparisons from the last time congress voted to impeach, the tri...

>> aye. >> aye. >> mr. meyer? >> aye. >> aye. >> the house judiciary committee has just approved its first article of impeachment against president nixon. >> mr. chairman? >> order of point. >> 27 members voted aye anticipate 11 no. >> that is adopted and will be reported to the house. >> trips through recent history of the two articles. the obstruction of congress charge is a fwhun. they drafted a contempt of congress charge against president nixon. and one of the whopping 11 articles against p...

In congress are handling the process. one gavel drops and others will follow as congress sets the stage for the third impeachment trial in american history, the fourth time congress has considered removing a president. tonight, the impeachment process for president trump is drawing strong comparisons to the last time congress moved to impeach. the 1998-99 trial of bill clinton and some capitalists believe is even more partisan and take no prisoners. >> where people cant talk to each other anymor...

Question the f.b.i. quote spied on the trump campaign. >> the court needs to take abuse of the seriously. they need to reprimand and hold people in contempt. if they arent willing to discipline people who manipulate evidence given to the court it will be hard for us to say the court should stay around. - [spokeswoman] meet the ninja foodi pressure cooker, the best of pressure cooking and air frying now in one pot, and with tendercrisp technology, you can cook foods that are crispy on the outside

Misdemeanors and zero counts of bribery and zero counts of treason. this what we got for three long years. just two made up baseless week backless charges that would never be allowed in a court of war law. this boils down to one the one thing only. that is the left, liberals, democrats, socialists, and their media mob friends, they think they know better than we, the people that voted for this president. they look down their noses at us. fine. they have contempt for all values, our views, our li...

Misdemeanors and zero counts of bribery and zero counts of treason. this what we got for three long years. just two made up baseless week fact lists charges that would never be allowed in a court of law. this boils down to one the one thing only. that is the left, liberals, democrats, socialists, and their media mob friends, they think they know better than we, the people that voted for this president. they look down their noses at us. fine. they have contempt for all values, our views, our life...

Horowitz says, but this is uncharted territory. nobody wants to apologize on the other side. okay. i get that. it might be politically embarrassing. but to say we dont need to go to court? i mean, the obama administration was just incredible at getting subpoenas, doing document dumps of stuff that didnt -- we really werent looking for, asking for, especially from judiciary, but the other stuff that we demanded, we couldnt get it, and we tried to get an order for court to hold them in contempt. t...

The compliance of that subpoena would have required him to violate the law. so like a reasonable rational deliberative body, what did we do? we held him in contempt. we held the attorney general of the united states in contempt of congress for not violating the law. but it gets better. after that we held a hearing in judiciary whether or not we should have held him in contempt. oversight democrats subpoenaed documents relating to a case in front of the supreme court. as i stated earlier those sa...

They said that democrats hate 63 million americans. that shows a contempt, a contempt, for the constitution, for the nature of this issue. and i think its just appalling. now, how do we put this into context? what were seeing today, im afraid, is in part a consequence of the decline in american respect and trust in institutions. i think there was a time when republicans and democrats, the members of a party whose president was not in office, who understood they had responsibilities of the consti...