Page 94 - Corroborating News Today

>> you just admitted -- >> if i may, a corroborating individual who has been convicted and who was going to continue to provide evidence to the special prosecutor. this is only the beginning of a pyramid prosecution. >> you just admitted there was an attempt. that means there was no collusion. maybe there was an attempt to have a meeting, but there was never a meeting. >> there were several meetings. >> let me ask you this. is that a good day for the president when there was an attempt to try to...

Committee, debbie wasserman schultz, that none of them knew that the campaign and the dnc were funding this opposition research that led to that controversial dossier? >> wolf, i dont know what they knew but i think its important to understand who paid for the dossier but thats not as important as whats alleged. because if whats alleged is true, that donald trump and his team were working with the russians to win the election, then it doesnt matter who paid for it. we now have a national securit...

Dan once worked for the secret service and the nypd and he joins us tonight. this doesnt seem like the kind of order that would come more than three weeks after a shooting both because it would be obvious. of course, you dont destroy evidence. if you send an order like that, wouldnt it be immediate? im confused. >> well, you are not wrong to be confused. you can add this to the list of perplexing things about this case which has me and a number of my law enforcement friends completely baffled. w...

Timeline for the shooting. why is this taking so long? dan once worked for the secret service and the nypd and he joins us tonight. this doesnt seem like the kind of order that would come more than three weeks after a shooting both because it would be obvious. of course, you dont destroy evidence. if you send an order like that, wouldnt it be immediate? im confused. >> well, you are not wrong to be confused. you can add this to the list of perplexing things about this case which has me and a num...

Dan once worked for the secret service and the nypd and he joins us tonight. this doesnt seem like the kind of order that would come more than three weeks after a shooting both because it would be obvious. of course, you dont destroy evidence. if you send an order like that, wouldnt it be immediate? im confused. >> well, you are not wrong to be confused. you can add this to the list of perplexing things about this case which has me and a number of my law enforcement friends completely baffled. w...

Dan once worked for the secret service and the nypd and he joins us tonight. this doesnt seem like the kind of order that would come more than three weeks after a shooting both because it would be obvious. of course, you dont destroy evidence. if you send an order like that, wouldnt it be immediate? im confused. >> well, you are not wrong to be confused. you can add this to the list of perplexing things about this case which has me and a number of my law enforcement friends completely baffled. w...

Anthony is one of the newest accusers saying weinstein rape heard in the late 1980s. >> she is not the only one to speak out in recent days. another unnamed woman has gone to the police to say weinstein attacked her as well. our brian stelter has the latest. >> reporter: police in london confirming they are looking into a second set of allegations against harvey weinstein. this coming two days after the actress lysette anthony came forward and said she was assaulted by weinstein in the 1980s. th...

Investigation. im not going to ask for a subpoena until i know some of the answers, because i want to see if somebodys lying when theyre sitting in front of me. >> jeff toobin, do you agree with that? >> i do. specifically, i think you dont want to start interviewing witnesses until you have documents. i mean, remember, the whole don jr. chapter of this investigation only arose because the e-mails came out. i mean, you know, there is this mythology that cross-examination of individuals can get p...

Jr. chapter of this investigation only arose because the e-mails came out. i mean, you know, there is this mythology that cross-examination of individuals can get people to tell the truth. what gets people to tell the truth are documents. corroborating or incriminating evidence that is independent of the testimony. and i am sure that mueller is not going to want to bring in significant witnesses, until he has seen the financial records, the e-mails, the texts that either incriminate or exculpate...

Interference in the 2016 election, these advisers worry that the presidents direct involvement leaves him needlessly vulnerable to allegations of a cover-up. quote, this was unnecessary, said one of the presidents advisers, who like many other people interviewed for the story spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal deliberations. now, someone can claim hes the one who attempted to mislead. someone could argue the president is saying he doesnt want you to say the whole truth...