Danny In News Today

>> joyce, let me ask you this question. and david has reporting that touches on this. if donald trump did know that people around him, potentially even his son, his children, were suborning crimes, isnt he liable for it? thats like saying, i know i won a million dollars and my son or daughter robs a bank to get me a million dollars. all i wanted was the million dollars. i didnt say to rob a bank but they did it to further my intent. wouldnt he still have liability there? >> danny did a great job...

Was just the conduit to get him there. >> let me bring danny in. if, for instance, donald trump decides i want my trump tower. im going to run for president as a way to further my brand, as a way to build myself up, as a way to get close enough personally to vladimir putin to get my power. i will give him what he wants and then i wont win and i will get my tower. the people around him say, no, we want to win. were going to take steps to win. if we have to trade campaign data, commit crimes, coco...

Illegal act like meddling in elections, as soon as people get connected closer and closer, the intent becomes easier to infer from the surrounding circumstances. so there is potential liability depending on what facts still remain. >> of course -- >> and joy -- >> go on. >> i just want to point out therein lies the problem. danny laid it out perfectly. what is the prosecutors challenge? the problem is there is still not been made a public connection between what everybody around trump was doing ...