we don t know that. anyway, let s move on to something else. we do know, glenn, the wall street journal reports that attorney general garland has deliberated for weeks according to people familiar with this matter. aside from his cautious approach, the decision had been the subject of weeks of meetings between senior justice department and fbi officials. again, this is according to the folks there. what does this level of cautious deliberation indicate in this investigation? alex, how could the attorney general not be as cautious as an attorney general or law enforcement official has ever been when we re talking about in this case searching the home of a former president, the de facto home at mar-a-lago. two sayings come to mind, he who hesitates is lost, but look before you leap. now merrick garland is clearly a
with xfinity mobile. or add a line to your plan today at xfinitymobile.com expected to testify in person in the investigation surrounding possible 2020 election interference in georgia by donald trump and his allies. it comes as new developments emerge in the probe. his attorneys tells nbc news that they were informed monday
have to testify to those facts without the protection of invoking the fifth. in new york, there s something called transactional immunity. that means if you put a witness in the grand jury, they re immune from prosecution for anything about which they testify except to the extent that they lie. so new york prosecutors have a lot of room irrespective of whether weisselberg agrees or doesn t agree to cooperate, to put him back before a grand jury. now, we also know that the new york das investigation of trump criminally is expected to be dormant. we saw two very high-profile prosecutors resign from that investigation months ago. but letitia james is still pursuing a civil investigation that could have dramatic consequences for the trump organization as a business. we know allan weisselberg testified already in that investigation. one of the things he told letitia james and her team is
there are decades of problems like this. it s that fred trump talked all know how to do this. and i m assuming donald told his children how to do this. and they re not all getting swept up merely into this. i think we expected this to arrive at the children s doorstep. but now we know it was definitely [inaudible] i think laetitia s james investigation is less consequence ill ultimately for them in that the da s investigation is a criminal investigation. but those two offices are sharing information with one another. anything that they say in this investigation under oath and i need evidence that she collects will also be shared with the manhattan district attorney s office. their lawyer, has gone out of his way to conflate these two investigation at being joined at the hip. in which they are not. they are in collaboration. the other thing to remember is that the lawyer made his bones
one by the attorney general, tish james, who is not running for governor but seeking re-election. this is confusing for people because there are two investigations in new york basically covering the same ground. letitia james, the attorney general, is looking into a civil investigation, and the da s investigation could end in charges. cy vance is leaving the end of the month. the newly elected da is taking over. he hasn t said much, but he hasn t given indication he is going to change course or stop the investigation. people inside the investigation expect it to continue. i can t guarantee there will be criminal charges, but it still seems like that s on the table, certainly, because they just started a new grand jury to consider those charges. what timeline are we looking at? when you say criminal charges, who would those be against, donald trump the person or the organization? the timeline looks like we won t see anything until the end