Day Dar News Today

this is dateline. >> the first time i saw her, i thought she was beautiful. we just loved being together, we were always together. our kitchen back door was opened and the glass was broken. >> i need an ambulance now. my wife, oh my god. >> it was him who found her. >> i said i dont know how to handle that. i wish i couldve been there to protect her. >> a wife murdered, and later, a husband under suspicion. >> he was such a nice guy that you wouldve never guess that he wouldve done som...

we were always together. >> our kitchen that door was open. glass was broken. >> i need an ambulance now. my wife. oh my god. >> it was him who found her. >> i dont know how to handle that. i wish i couldve been there to protect her. >> a wife murdered, and later, a husband under suspicion. >> he was such a nice guy, that you wouldve never guess that he wouldve done something like that. >> you think you fake that burglary and killed his wife? >> yes. >> he wanted the house, he wanted h...

>> he tried to. and it was stopped. >> who tried and who stopped? >> he tried, and we both stopped. >> you dont have a sexual relationship with somebody within two weeks after your wifes been murdered in that house. >> but the jury never heard marianne crandalls testimony because there was no indication of a romantic relationship prior to dars murder, the judge ruled, just as he did in first trial, that her testimony was prejudicial and, therefore, inadmissible. it was a huge blow to the prosecu...

Thats not true. if i could go back and change it, i would. but i cant. >> this was an event that involved grief and a reaching out, and it happened. >> do you love your wife? >> i love her very much. >> did you love her on. february 7, 2009? >> very much so. >> did you have anything to do with her death? >> not at all. >> before closing arguments, the prosecutor had one more card to play in the form of a surprise rebuttal witness who could unravel toms alibi. >> please state your name for the re...

>> you dont have a sexual relationship with somebody within two weeks after your wifes been murdered in that house. >> but the jury never heard marianne crandalls testimony because there was no indication of a romantic relationship prior to dars murder, the judge ruled, just as he did in first trial, that her testimony was prejudicial and, therefore, inadmissible. it was a huge blow to the prosecutions case. >> it supports the position that they werent this deeply in love couple that he kept try...

Stopped. >> you dont have a sexual relationship with somebody within two weeks after your wifes been murdered in that house. >> but the jury never heard marianne crandalls testimony because there was no indication of a romantic relationship prior to dars murder, the judge ruled, just as he did in first trial, that her testimony was prejudicial and, therefore, inadmissible. it was a huge blow to the prosecutions case. >> it supports the position that they werent this deeply in love couple that he...

>> who tried and who stopped? >> he tried, and we both stopped. >> you dont have a sexual relationship with somebody within two weeks after your wifes been murdered in that house. >> but the jury never heard marianne crandalls testimony because there was no indication of a romantic relationship prior to dars murder, the judge ruled, just as he did in first trial, that her testimony was prejudicial and, therefore, inadmissible. it was a huge blow to the prosecutions case. >> it supports the posit...

>> you dont have a sexual relationship with somebody within two weeks after your wifes been murdered in that house. >> but the jury never heard marianne crandalls testimony because there was no indication of a romantic relationship prior to dars murder, the judge ruled, just as he did in first trial, that her testimony was prejudicial and, therefore, inadmissible. it was a huge blow to the prosecutions case. >> it supports the position that they werent this deeply in love couple that he kept try...

Marianne crandalls testimony because there was no indication of a romantic relationship prior to dars murder, the judge ruled, just as he did in first trial, that her testimony was prejudicial and, therefore, inadmissible. it was a huge blow to the prosecutions case. >> it supports the position that they werent this deeply in love couple that he kept trying to present. i mean, that would have proven that. >> but norris still had her two key witnesses, toms own son heath and heaths friend skyler ...

>> i love her very much. >> did you love her on. february 7, 2009? >> very much so. >> did you have anything to do with her death? >> not at all. >> before closing arguments, the prosecutor had one more card to play in the form of a surprise rebuttal witness who could unravel toms alibi. >> please state your name for the record. >> amber rappeljay. >> out of the presence of the jury, dars niece told the court that one week before dar was murdered she went to the farm to babysit. >> she told us n...