Devaluing Everybodys Vote News Today

Nothing sewed nothing and then all of a sudden there is this leak that came out right before this vote that was going to happen on judge kavanaugh and judge kavanaugh came with the facts he opened his heart and spoke the truth. from there its just so telling the fact that this man deserves to be on the supreme court. brian: what we heard yesterday over and over again to brett kavanaugh as if they had short-term memory loss every democratic lawmaker, why dont you call for an fbi investigation? wh...

>> i dont believe that and shame on the democrats for exploiting her and exploiting her story. and if they really cared about dr. ford, why didnt they go to the police? why didnt they go to the fbi? >> exactly. >> the one thing that i need to say to all americans, yesterday it was kavanaugh. today it could be your brother, your son, your father or your husband. so vote right so you wont get left. vote republican because the circus and the charades that the democrats just pulled, i dont ever want...

Blows because they didnt want to see those optics. but, you know, it was frustrating for a lot of people dividing this into five minute increments did not allow for any real substantive questioning to occur. steve: okay. so after the 8 or 9 hours of testimony that we saw yesterday later this morning they are probably going to vote. where are we after having watched that? >> i think he did a lot of good for himself. if the vote had been taken after dr. fords testimony, i think his confirmation wo...

When heidi camp comes from north dakota which vote i had republican 16 out of the last 17 presidential races for the more conservative judges, donnelly comes from indiana voted 15 out of 17 times. you got tester comes from montana which voted 15 out of 17 times. did you go back and say every time voters choice between liberal and conservative judge, they voted for the president who appoints conservatives. now, is there enough evidence here to justify not voting for kavanaugh? and i think yesterd...

Griff watch? steve: yes he did and is he here to explain. >> rest of the nation transfixed to that hearing and history will be being made in about two and a half hours. the judges fate now ultimately is going to be determined by these three undecided republican senators. susan collins, lisa murkowski and jeff flake. the reason is the math. the g.o.p. can only afford to lose one vote, lose two and kavanaugh goes down. right now 47 republicans are a yes. a very encouraging sign for the nominee, a ...

Do. there is not a lot of witnesses here. they can just issue the statement statements nut form of a 302. im not sure that would manifestly change anything. steve: now where we are we are to the stage where everybody is going to be put on the spot, first the committee and then after that the full senate where a number of vulnerable democrats in states that donald trump won are going to have to take a hard vote, jonathan. >> oh, i think thats true. i think he put them back on their heels yesterda...

Devaluing everybodys vote. steve: did the president mention the kavanaugh hearing? >> he did mention it. he said he watched it through. he came a little later because he wanted to make sure he watched it all. he thought kavanaugh did very well. his passion was for everybody involved. but, i thought from the standpoints i talked to him after the event as well. i think they have to move forward. i think america has been through enough of this. lets have the vote and move forward. steve: does he pa...

As a rapist and most people would be quite angry. >> if you vote no, you are legitimizing the most despicable thing i have seen in my time in politics. you want this seat? i hope you never get it. ♪ steve: this is a fox news alert. you saw the testimony that we were waiting for after about 10 days. she said, then said and in a few hours. ainsley: they say. steve: they will vote. brian: they will have a procedural vote saturday and tuesday go right to the senate floor. the goal, of course, is j...

Allegations without evidence. this woman they believe what she says they believe. you can believe her and have sympathy for her. it isnt enough to derail this mans nomination, destroy his reputation. this is why it should have been held privately. you could have evaluated her and said you know what? we appreciate you think that happened 35 years ago. there is not enough evidence to derail this nomination. we are not going to torture you by going through public recitation and him. both were abuse...

Details, really. no new evidence. so where are we this morning? >> well, you know, despite this big circus of a hearing, it didnt advance the ball in terms of providing oh my gosh, he certainly did it or anything that would suggest that you cant trust anything this woman said, you know, other than the fact she had no corroborating evidence and no one supported her. of course we knew that the day before the hearing and we didnt need a hearing to now know what we know today which is why his case o...