Disruptive to that point and really to all of our riders on the west side of town. But were coming out of this project thanks to the engagement of the community, we have a very good project. People are very pleased with the results from an infrastructure standpoint, much better and smoother, more reliable service. But also from a safety standpoint for pedestrians, cyclists, motorists, and muni riders a maytionv achievement. 11 00 a. M. , church and duboce well be celebrating with the community the success of that project. And that concludes my report. Thank you, director rifkin. I want to say on the 28th i hope as many members of the board will be able to join and go in the various divisions. We see it in a monthly basis for those we honor. Where can you see it on a daily basis . I think its pretty much everybody almost every day. I encourage everyone to go in the celebration. Okay, anybody else on this particular item . I want to add my personal thank you for the left turn pocket on v
So, thank you very much. applause id also like to thank the board and mr. Rifkin and mr. Haley for giving me the opportunity to lead young and also the maintenance crew. Again, to reiterate what young said, its the guys, the boots on the ground that really carry this through, that when everyone else is sleeping, theyre the ones out fixing the problems and getting the project done. So, i appreciate all of them, all your crew and all of the signal maintenance crew. Thank you for outstanding work on these two vital projects. Director heinicke. Sure. I will say a special thank you. This has been as you know, terry and young, its nice to see you. Something of particular interest to me. And i think it would be remiss if i didnt note particular interest to director beach who i suspect is smiling for a brief moment and then will continue yelling at you guys. [laughter] so, on that note i will say this is a very tangible and significant thing. The speed and the curve is significant. When you mu
Also submittals in spanish and chinese as well. The premise of this game was a participant would go to the site and would have a gauge a counter that would show the amount of transportation revenue that we expect to have through 2040. The participant would make choices about how to invest that revenue in operations and maintenance, street maintenance, walking, biking, signals, capital expansion projects. The participant could choose whether or not they wanted to add additional revenue, raise taxes or fees in some way, have additional revenue to their budget and they could see what additional investment could be afforded if they made that choice. This is a summary other groups that we reached. I would note that we did ask for volunteer information about participants zip codes, and incoming demographic information. Only about 55 percent of the participants actually gave us that. What you are seeing here is a map of the 55 percent of the participants who did give their zip code noting abo
Budget tzar game, where participants could create their own longrange plan. Got a great response. These are the mechanisms that we used to get the word out about the budget game and about the Transportation Plan update in general. We had discussions about priorities, investment priorities, tradeoffs, revenues, and where we have shortfalls in other venues besides the online budget games. We went to Community Events in every district. We went to over 18 Community Groups and boards and commissions and had this conversation. It wasnt just the budget game. That we used to get this input. The budget game turned out to be very popular though; we had over 800 submittals. Also submittals in spanish and chinese as well. The premise of this game was a participant would go to the site and would have a gauge a counter that would show the amount of transportation revenue that we expect to have through 2040. The participant would make choices about how to invest that revenue in operations and mainten
A gauge a counter that would show the amount of transportation revenue that we expect to have through 2040. The participant would make choices about how to invest that revenue in operations and maintenance, street maintenance, walking, biking, signals, capital expansion projects. The participant could choose whether or not they wanted to add additional revenue, raise taxes or fees in some way, have additional revenue to their budget and they could see what additional investment could be afforded if they made that choice. This is a summary other groups that we reached. I would note that we did ask for volunteer information about participants zip codes, and incoming demographic information. Only about 55 percent of the participants actually gave us that. What you are seeing here is a map of the 55 percent of the participants who did give their zip code noting about 15 percent of the respondents were not San Francisco residents or indicated they were not San Francisco residents. These wer