Diseasing Nae News Today

Administration diseasing nae is than a half a billion acres of land and water including bears ears. it did so over the loud objections of the people of this state and their elected representatives. governor, right? the results have been very sad and very predictable. here and in other affected states, we have seen harmful or unnecessary restrictions on r ranching and responsible economic development. we have seen grazing restrictions prevent ranching families from passing their businesses and be...

This law requires that only a small necessary protection protects monuments. unfortunately, some have ignored the standard and used the law to lock up hundreds of millions of acres of land and water under strict government control. these abuses of the antiquities act give enormous power to far away bureaucrats at the expense of the people who actually live here, work here and make this place their home. this is where they raise their children. this is the place they love. for example, the previo...

>> and were going to do the following -- [ applause ] >> okay, if you havent been following this topic and what its about, the president signed proclamations to dramatically scale back the size of two national monuments in utah. we refer to them as monuments but they are large pieces of land. the administration has plans now to reduce bears ears national monument by nearly 85%. and the grand staircase escalante in half. opponents have vowed to fight the white house in court about this. i believe...

Exchange in for land on my reservation because of the value of and there. >> so the idea is if you get it out of federal protection, it means that land could ultimately be exploited for oil and gas, sold, used for commercial purposes, things like that. >> well, thats the whole thing. the monuments are designed to protect looking at cultural artifacts, which bears ears meets the criteria. they have said it point-blankly. we are marking up the resource by designating this monument. so i dont think...

Chief lawmaker under the constitution. your thoughts? >> we have heard before from richard nixon that the president is above the law. that didnt work for nixon and its not going to work for trump. and this is just an extension of the trump administrations attitude. he said a number of months ago the president cant have a conflict of interest. thats wrong, too. the president is not above the law. we live in a democracy. we have a constitution. and if he doesnt want to comply with the constitution...