Page 101 - Disqualifying News Today

Obviously, that didnt happen. i think he was right -- i understand judge kavanaughs frustration in that testimony. it wasnt that he was angry that bothered me. its what he chose and took the political angle to really, to double down in it and to be so angry and to get so into the political fray on it and then on top of that, the temperment ame showed in the hearing. i think that anger and this whole process is something that really destroyed a part of him and its a part i think that will haunt h...

Disqualifying for any court and certainly for ". moments ago, cakavanaughs freshman roommate at yale broke his silence. he said judge kavanaugh lied during his testimony last week. he hat sposnt spoken publicly this until now. tonight i asked him why. >> i saw him do this stuff he said under oath he didnt do. i saw him use words in a different way than he said under oath they were used. if a person isnt truthful about these little things, we ought to think very seriously about whether we should ...

Should not confirm kavanaugh. it was signed 650 plus law professors and counting. the letter reads in part, "judicial temperament is one of the most important qualities of the judge. as the congressional research service explains, a judge requires a personality that is even-handed, unbiased, impartial, courteous, yet firm and dedicated to a process, not a result. the concern for judicial temperament dates back to our founding." goes on to say, "were law professors who teach, research and write a...

Judge kavanaugh in the second hearing, right, the hearing that was just him and professor ford, that we didnt see displayed in his first hearing was his temperament. we saw his temperament on display. im sure you have seen in the times this morning, theres a letter signed by 1,000 law professors saying that temperament is disqualifying for someone to sit on the supreme court. we wouldnt have seen that otherwise. should his temperament as we saw displayed in the second hearing be considered by se...

Collins of maine. tonight, i should tell you that "the new york times" published this letter signed by over 650 u.s. law professors, and counting. "judicial temperment is one of the most important qualities of a judge. a judge requires a personality that is even handed, unbiased, impartial, courteous yet firm, and dedicated to a process, not a result. at the senate hearings, judge kavanaugh displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court. we have differing view...

The beginning of the show. that is apart from the allegations of sexual assault, the allegation of sex sual assault, more than 1,000 law professiors have signed this letter. judge brett kavanaugh displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this land. do you agree from a legal end from what you saw and is that germane to this? >> i do agree. we have never seen a supreme court nominee behave that way. it is ...

Which has oversight of the federal courts. let me start with this letter which is a remarkable document, 650 law professors. these are fairly high status individuals, those are folks with different ideologies, basically just zeroing in on how judge kavanaugh performed on thursday, the level of sort of partisan vitriol, and the incompatibility of that with serving on the highest court of the land. what do you think about that? >> thank you, chris, for your question. that is a remarkable letter an...

I dont think a general inquest into how much he liked beer in his late teens and early 20s is appropriate at all. >> i went too long with you, but one final question. do you think a justice kavanaugh owes the public some sort of explanation for his partisan outburst? >> i think the partisan outburst was -- >> you believe thats disqualifying? >> i think it was incredibly inappropriate and that alone -- >> for you, it was disqualifying. >> if i were a senator, that alone would give me a real probl...

Brett kavanaugh displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court. and certainly for the elevation to the highest court of this land. quote, we have differing views about the other qualifications of judge kavanaugh, but we are united as professors of law and scholars of judicial inconstitutions in believing he did not display the judicial temperament requisite to sit on the highe esest court. that published just tonight in "the new york times." over 650 law profe...

The corroborating thing, and i dont think that mark judge would say, yeah, my best friend did that and he is the only one in the room. what is interesting to me is that did they ask mark judge and chris garrett and tim gaudet his high school friends what the definition of the terms were in the yearbook were, because they seem to be quite obviously and plainly wrong and incorrect. and if jeff flake is going to say that if he lied under oath that is disqualifying, and that is a more interesting an...