would be if, you know, doj officials in this country were to grant him immunity or said something to the effect of we are never going to criminally prosecute you for potential crimes. 0therwise, criminally prosecute you for potential crimes. otherwise, he can certainly invoke his fifth amendment right. his certainly invoke his fifth amendment riiht. , ., , , certainly invoke his fifth amendment riiht. , , ., certainly invoke his fifth amendment riht. , , ., ., certainly invoke his fifth amendment riiht. , , ., ., . right. his lawyers have now received a co of right. his lawyers have now received a copy of it right. his lawyers have now received a copy of it the right. his lawyers have now received a copy of it the 2009 right. his lawyers have now received a copy of it the 2009 settlement - a copy of it the 2009 settlement that she signed with jeffrey a copy of it the 2009 settlement that she signed withjeffrey epstein which they believe will end this lawsuit certainly that s the
light as to the events that happened the day of january 6th. this will not be the last time the president will likely have to weigh in on these documents. there are going to be more document requests ahead. listen to what jen psaki, the white house press secretary had to say about this yesterday. the president has determined that an assertion of executive privilege is not warranted for the first set of documents from the trump white house that had been provided to us by the national archives. as we ve said previously, this will be an ongoing process, and this is just the first set of documents, and we will e. questions of privilege on a case by case basis. reporter: the decision as to whether or not to turn over documents to the house committee ultimately might not lie with president biden. donald trump has vowed to fight this move by president biden, and we expect him to seek legal action. so ultimately, this could end up in the courts, and the decision
all right. we re following that breaking news out of washington tonight. in just the last hour the january 6th select committee dropped four subpoenas for people either working in or communicating with the white house in the days leading up to the insurrection. the committee is seeking information from former white house chief of staff mark meadows. dan skavino, steve bannon and defense department official kash patel. the senior adviser of investigations for the house intelligence committee. a former federal prosecutor and he joins me now. dan, this is skipping past the request phase. we saw some document requests go out. what s the significance of these four subpoenas to your mind? well, there are several things. the first is as the committee
the heart of this, behind this. and when you look at this lineup here, meadows is an obvious person to subpoena. he was the president s chief of staff, by his side throughout january 6. the other three tell us that the committee is looking at the planning, the communication strategy. that s scavino, bannon. and what was the response over at defense department? that s where kash patel comes out. they re taking a holistic look here but they re looking at the people behind all this. let s look at the time line here. the committee says all document requests are due by october 7th. they want patel and bannon to appear before the committee on october 14th and scavino and meadows october 15th. this is really lightening fast. they surely won t cooperate, so what does the committee do then? yeah, this is a lightening fast schedule and rightly so, don. because what the committee cannot do is let itself get slow played to death here. that s why they ve only given a couple of weeks. if these f
meadows is on obvious person subpoena. the other three tell us that the committee is looking at the planning, the communication strategy. that s scavino, bannon. and what was the defense over at the defense department? they re taking a holistic look here but they re looking at the people behind all this. let s look at the time line here. the committee says all document requests are due by october 7th. they want patel and bannon to appear before the committee on october 14th and scavino and meadows october 15th. this is really lightening fast. they surely won t cooperate, so what does the committee do then? yeah, this is a lightening fast schedule and rightly so, don. because what the committee cannot do is let itself get slow played to death here. that s why they ve only given a couple of weeks. if these folks decline to comply with the subpoenas and i think you can bet they ll not comply with the subpoenas. then the committee needs to a,