Doesnt Charge Them News Today

To 20-20-20. frstill, we never stoppedss wamaking it stronger.. faster. smarter. because to be the best, is to never ever stop making it better. the new 2019 c-class family. visit your local mercedes-benz dealer for exceptional lease & financing offers during the mercedes-benz spring event. going on now. what is that? uh mine, why? its just that its... lavender. yes it is, its for men but i like the smell of it laughs ♪

Point if not tomorrow in the later, larger information for congress about the obstruction and thats are really big oversight question, what congress wants to do about that. some of the elements of obstruction occurred in plain sight. "the new york times" reported he tried to fire mueller. when nixon did that, it was part of his undoing. frank, i want to give you a chance to respond. heres what someone on fox news, tucker carlson said friday nights show. >> after all of this, years of it, not a s...

What does it mean? the implications what we learn tomorrow, potentially. >> thing is the, you know, we already run into the hard part for the justice department. because while there are some notable exceptions that got some people in trouble, for the most part, when the justice department investigates somebody, and it doesnt charge them, it doesnt blurt it out. it doesnt say we investigated somebody for bank fraud or for child pornography but we decided not to charge them because we didnt have t...

You have those factors. but think about how narrow, really, the mandate was to this special counsel. that was to investigate russian interference with u.s. elections and whether there was any conspiracy with the trump organization. thats pretty narrow. >> when people keep hearing that, it is and it isnt. what do you make of the result that he found a lot of crime but didnt bust anyone for those links? >> right. he established the russian hacking pretty well in that gru die. but what he probably,...

People trying to help the boss out. the boss may or may not know whats going on, so mueller may have said, look, if its not airtight, im not charging it, but im going to explain it in the report and i think thats what we should expect. >> its fascinating to hear this from a team people want straight-up legal context and facts on a probe that by any measure indicted a lot of people. but also, as a collusion probe, didnt hit those indictments. carol, joyce, greg, and frank, my thanks to each of yo...

Anymore indictments but here is all the sound byte ways we can say this. he was negligent, he was reckless, he didnt act with good intent. then the idea that democrats ive been talking to saying we want the supporting evidence. its not enough for the democrats on the hill to get the report. they want the footnotes and everything they can get their hands on. >> we heard senator blumenthal saying he wants -- you cant get that without a judge. thats not bill barr or bob muellers call. >> exactly. e...

More than 100 criminal counts total, a lot of activity. what was missing, of course, apparently, because no further indictments are coming, at least from the mueller investigation, was any kind of grand conspiracy indictment relating to coordination from donald trump and the campaign. >> taking that to joyce, ive had the benefit of your analysis from the moment this broke on the beat last night at 6:00. what do you think of the big calls? he was gutsy in going after the presidents lawyer and cam...

Wider panel, we dont know whats going to be in that, but as you say, its in the paragraph that refers to the special counsel rules relatively narrow description of who you charged and didnt charge. for everyone weigh on edge or all the viewers whove been watching you report on all of this, what does that mean the implications of what we learn tomorrow potentially? >> we already run into the hard part for the justice department. while there are notable exceptions that got some people in trouble, ...