Doesnt Comey News Today

would not charge her based on that.. no one. >> sean: but if were going to have equal justice under the law, doesnt comey -- doesnt we have a case of obstruction for himm or him and peter strzok, if they break the entire investigation, theth special investigation, and they hid the evidence? >> that is why congress is calling them in. i think strzok is in a tremendous amount of trouble. i think comey is going to be in trouble. in his mind, the best defense is a good offense, and that is what ...

Charge her based on that. no one. >> but if we go -- if were gonna have equal justice under the law, doesnt comey now -- dont we have a case of obstruction, pam, for him and peter strzok if they rigged the entire investigation, the special investigation and they hid the evidence? >> and thats why congress is calling them in. i think strzok is in tremendous amount of trouble. i think comey is going to be in trouble. i think in his mind the best defense is a good offense and thats what he is tryin...

Hes either wants to clear his name, of course, trump fired him some republicans in congress agreed with that, and then we learned trump called comey a nut job, or hes got a bombshell about bombshell about president trump and the conversations those two had in private. it could be both of those things, but i just firmly believe he is going in front of congress for a specific reason next week. >> doesnt comey usually have a bombshell when he sits there? >> he was really good at that, right, in 200...

Something smart. certainly. gregg: isnt that what the president then did. >> perhaps. thats why calling it a criminal is not doing it good. no one will prosecute the president in the courtroom. will it lead to further investigation, impeachment proceedings. parsing the statutory language here is not that useful. gregg: when nixon fired archibald cox that was not in and of itself obstruction. it was considered that he had a constitutional authority to do it. now, doug, doesnt comey himself have a...